What happened with IAUX today?
No read yet
Uses news and trading volume to explain the day’s move and how it relates to the market.
Stop guessing. Get the call, a three-month target price, the best and worst cases, and a source for every claim.
i-80 Gold Corp.’s Granite Creek underground mine supplies most of its revenue. The company sells recovered gold and silver to metals buyers and also sells some gold-bearing material directly for others to process. Recovered-metal sales are the larger revenue source. Ruby Hill and Lone Tree contribute smaller amounts, including gold recovered from previously mined material. Gold can be sold through commodity traders worldwide, although one customer accounts for most unpaid sales receivables.
Processing is a central dependency. At Granite Creek, the company pays a third party to process sulfide material, sells high-grade oxide material and treats lower-grade oxide material at Lone Tree. The Lone Tree Plant is currently non-operational. i-80 Gold plans to refurbish it to process material from its underground projects itself; until then, it relies on outside processing arrangements that expire at the end of 2027.
Despite ongoing extraction, all its properties remain classified as exploration-stage under mining disclosure rules because no mineral reserves have been defined. Advancing the other projects requires additional financing beyond what Granite Creek operations can provide. The company reports having the permits needed for its current activities, but future development and operational changes require further approvals.
The risk section is the longest, dullest part of the filing. This keeps only what can really hurt you: where it hits, how hard, when it plays out.
Every company claims an edge. Each one is checked against hard numbers like margins and returns: which hold, and which line gives way first.
Watch Orion alongside gold prices and processing progress: i-80 Gold’s Nevada development depends on securing financing and meeting its obligations to Orion.
i-80 Gold relies on Barrick Mining’s Nevada Gold Mines operations to process ore while its own plant is refurbished; Barrick also produces gold in Nevada. Processing-capacity news there matters directly to i-80 Gold’s interim production arrangements.
Integra Resources Corp. shares i-80 Gold’s exposure to gold prices, Great Basin mining costs and project permits, operating Florida Canyon while developing gold projects in Nevada and Idaho. Florida Canyon’s output and progress at Nevada North offer nearby comparisons for i-80 Gold’s production and development plans.
Newmont shares i-80 Gold’s gold-price exposure and holds a minority interest in Nevada Gold Mines, whose processing operations support i-80 Gold’s interim milling arrangements. For i-80 Gold, news about those Nevada processing operations is more directly relevant than Newmont’s worldwide gold output.
Vox Royalty Corp. buys gold from i-80 Gold under an agreement covering up to 40,000 ounces per calendar year through December 31, 2028, at a market-referenced price. Vox’s receipts depend on deliveries, but if i-80 Gold produces less than the annual quantity, it need only deliver the ounces actually produced.
Contango Silver & Gold Inc. shares i-80 Gold’s exposure to U.S. gold production and mine development, receiving production-linked cash distributions from its Alaska venture while advancing exploration properties. Watch the Manh Choh venture’s cash distributions—not sales revenue—as a comparison for turning gold output into cash.
Mako Mining Corp parallels i-80 Gold’s western U.S. gold-growth plans, ramping up mining at Moss in Arizona and holding the Mt. Hamilton gold-silver development project in Nevada. Moss’s ramp-up is the concrete comparison to watch as i-80 Gold increases mining at Granite Creek.
Equinox Gold Corp. shares i-80 Gold’s exposure to gold prices and western U.S. mine economics through its California assets, alongside larger Canadian operations; it sells refined gold to bullion banks, traders and refiners. Castle Mountain’s expansion permits provide a specific comparison for the approval risks in i-80 Gold’s development plans.
Coeur Mining and i-80 Gold share exposure to gold and silver prices and Nevada mining conditions: Coeur produces both metals at Rochester, while i-80 Gold mines and develops Nevada precious-metal deposits.
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. offers a comparison for i-80 Gold’s move toward its own processing hub: it mines gold at Golden Chest in Idaho and processes the ore at the New Jersey Mill it manages. Golden Chest output and mill operations are the relevant comparison, rather than its rare-earth exploration projects.
Aris Mining Corporation shares i-80 Gold’s challenge of expanding underground gold production, and earns most of its revenue by selling unrefined gold bars to refiners. Segovia’s ramp-up after its plant expansion and construction at Marmato provide comparisons for Granite Creek’s growth and i-80 Gold’s planned underground mines.
Skeena Resources Limited shares i-80 Gold’s construction and financing exposure as it develops Eskay Creek, with Orion providing funding in exchange for future gold deliveries under a gold stream. Watch its completion test: missing September 30, 2027 increases Orion’s share of payable gold, showing how delays can make development financing more costly.
IAMGold Corporation and i-80 Gold both depend on gold prices and executing mine investments, combining producing mines with development projects. IAMGold’s Canadian Côté Gold and Westwood mines and its Nelligan exploration work provide production and development comparisons, rather than a direct Nevada operating link.
Alamos Gold shares i-80 Gold’s gold-price and mine-development exposure, producing gold in Canada and Mexico while building Lynn Lake in Manitoba. Lynn Lake’s construction progress is the clearest comparison for i-80 Gold’s planned new mines.
Agnico Eagle’s mining margins respond to the same gold-price changes as i-80 Gold’s: it produces precious metals and traditionally sells all production at spot gold prices rather than selling future output forward. Its realized gold prices and per-ounce production costs help distinguish the shared price effect from mine-specific execution.
B2Gold Corp.’s mine economics respond to the same gold prices that affect i-80 Gold, as it sells mined gold at market prices to bullion dealers and refiners. Its gold sales provide a price comparison, not a signal of dependence on one buyer: both companies can access multiple purchasers.
Aura Minerals Inc. shares i-80 Gold’s gold-price and production-growth exposure, though its mines and expansions are in Latin America and it also sells copper. Gold supplied 73% of Aura’s 2025 revenue, making that revenue line more relevant to i-80 Gold than its copper and gold-concentrate business.
Centerra Gold Inc. shares i-80 Gold’s exposure to gold prices and U.S. gold-project development through its operating gold mines and Goldfield project, but also has copper and molybdenum businesses. Goldfield’s development news is the closer comparison for i-80 Gold’s Nevada plans than Centerra’s business upgrading and selling third-party molybdenum.
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. earningsAEM
Agnico Eagle’s realized gold price and per-ounce production costs will show whether higher gold prices are being offset by mine costs, giving i-80 Gold a read on the shared price backdrop.
Compare Agnico Eagle’s realized gold price with its production cost per ounce. A higher price with costs contained would show stronger support for miners’ margins and a favorable reference for i-80 Gold’s gold sales; costs rising faster would show that a gold-price increase does not necessarily translate into better mine economics. Agnico Eagle’s costs are not i-80 Gold’s costs, so the conclusion is about the shared gold-price backdrop, not i-80 Gold’s own execution.
Barrick Mining Corporation earningsB
Barrick Mining’s report will show how Nevada Gold Mines’ processing operations are running, a relevant check on the interim milling route i-80 Gold relies on before its own Lone Tree plant operates.
Look for Barrick Mining’s discussion of Nevada Gold Mines’ processing operations and capacity. Steady operations and available capacity would support i-80 Gold’s interim processing route; constraints or disruption could make it harder to process i-80 Gold’s material on time, slowing the path from mined ore to sales. The conclusion is whether this outside route can continue to support i-80 Gold before Lone Tree operates.
i-80 Gold Corp. earningsThis company
i-80 Gold needs Granite Creek sales to turn the mine’s ramp-up into cash, and this report will show whether more gold is being sold at a profit.
Read Granite Creek’s gold production and ounces sold together, then compare realized price with gross profit. Rising sales and improving gross profit would show mine activity turning into sales and profit; if ounces sold barely increase and revenue rises mainly with gold prices, the ramp-up has not yet shown much added output. Then check company-wide operating cash flow: if it remains negative, projects such as Ruby Hill and Lone Tree still need outside funding. The conclusion is whether Granite Creek’s growth is beginning to support i-80 Gold’s development plans with cash from operations.
Vox Royalty Corp. earningsVOXR
Vox Royalty buys gold from i-80 Gold, and its report can show how much gold is moving through that sales channel if it discloses the deliveries.
If Vox Royalty reports gold deliveries from i-80 Gold, read them against the agreement’s limit of up to 40,000 ounces per calendar year. More deliveries would show more i-80 Gold gold moving through this buyer channel; fewer deliveries alone would not show weak demand or a breach, because i-80 Gold only has to deliver ounces it produces. The conclusion is how much output this agreement channel is handling, not how all of i-80 Gold’s sales are doing.
