B in three months: buy, wait or sell?
Stop guessing. Get the call, a three-month target price, the best and worst cases, and a source for every claim.
- Buy / Wait / Sell rating
- 3-month target price
- Bear · Base · Bull
- vs. the market
What happened with B today?
No read yet
Uses news and trading volume to explain the day’s move and how it relates to the market.
Stop guessing. Get the call, a three-month target price, the best and worst cases, and a source for every claim.
Barrick Mining Corporation operates mines and holds interests in mining ventures across several continents. It extracts and processes ore, with gold providing most of its revenue and copper a smaller share. Nevada Gold Mines, which Barrick operates and majority-owns, supplies a large part of its gold production; Lumwana in Zambia is its main copper-producing mine.
Bullion dealers and refiners buy its gold, while smelters, traders and copper product manufacturers buy its copper products. Sales prices are tied to metal markets. A few large customers account for a substantial share of revenue, but Barrick says it is not economically dependent on them because many other gold buyers are available.
Cash generation depends chiefly on gold prices, and also on copper prices, production volumes and mining costs. Sustaining production requires replacing ore depleted by mining through exploration, mine expansion or acquisitions. Mining and development require government permits; losing or failing to obtain them can stop operations or projects.
The risk section is the longest, dullest part of the filing. This keeps only what can really hurt you: where it hits, how hard, when it plays out.
Every company claims an edge. Each one is checked against hard numbers like margins and returns: which hold, and which line gives way first.
Barrick’s results hinge chiefly on gold prices and mine execution; Zijin Mining, absent from this list, is also a partner through the Porgera joint venture.
Newmont and Barrick both produce gold and share Nevada Gold Mines and Pueblo Viejo, so mine performance affects both directly, beyond their common exposure to gold prices and mining costs. Watch Newmont’s dispute over Barrick’s management of Nevada Gold Mines: its allegations and default notice put the partnership behind a major source of Barrick’s gold output in focus.
AngloGold Ashanti shares Barrick’s gold-price exposure and depends on Barrick to operate their jointly owned Kibali mine in the Democratic Republic of the Congo; it sells refined gold to bullion banks, while Barrick sells to dealers and refiners. Kibali output and any disagreement over its budget or operations matter to both owners.
Agnico Eagle is a useful margin benchmark for Barrick: both produce gold at comparable scale and sell at market prices. Compare their costs to sustain gold production—Agnico reported $1,339 per ounce in 2025 against Barrick’s $1,637, though these non-GAAP measures are not standardized.
Kinross and Barrick share exposure to gold prices and mine costs, mining substantial volumes in the Americas and selling into the world bullion market to banks, dealers and refiners. Kinross’s Americas mines supplied 76% of its 2025 gold-equivalent production, making that output a regional comparison for Barrick rather than a readout of its African mines.
Higher gold sale prices lift profits and cash generation at both Gold Fields and Barrick, which mine and sell gold internationally. Gold Fields’s average price received rose 45% to US$3,496 per ounce in 2025; watch its gold sales alongside production to distinguish the price lift from better mine performance.
Royal Gold depends on Barrick-linked mine output: it paid Barrick upfront for the right to buy gold and silver from Barrick’s Pueblo Viejo share, then pays a percentage of spot prices on delivery under a long-term stream. Watch its Pueblo Viejo metal deliveries and revenue from Barrick-operated properties; Barrick owes no deliveries when Pueblo Viejo has no production.
Franco-Nevada receives a share of profits from two Barrick-operated assets, so those receipts reflect both metal prices and Barrick’s mine economics. That differs from most of Franco-Nevada’s revenue: production-based royalties and metal-purchase streams generated 91% in 2025 without adjustments for operators’ operating costs.
Wheaton Precious Metals benefits from higher gold prices alongside Barrick, but pays miners upfront and a contractually fixed amount for delivered metal before reselling it, rather than mining it itself. Watch its realized gold sale prices for the shared price effect, not as a benchmark for Barrick’s mining costs.
B2Gold Corp. and Barrick both sell mined gold to bullion dealers and refiners at market prices and operate in Mali, linking their margins to gold prices and their operations to country-specific mining risk. Watch news from B2Gold’s Fekola mine alongside Barrick’s Loulo-Gounkoto, where a mining-convention dispute interrupted operations and control in 2025.
IAMGold Corporation offers a comparison for Barrick’s gold exposure across North America and West Africa, producing gold at Côté Gold and Westwood in Canada and Essakane in Burkina Faso. Keep its Canadian and Burkina Faso mine results separate when comparing regional performance with Barrick.
Alamos Gold gives Barrick holders a focused North American gold-mining comparison: it mines in Canada and Mexico, while North America supplies more than half of Barrick’s gold output. Watch production at Island Gold, Young-Davidson and Mulatos rather than treating Alamos’s results as a comparison for Barrick’s copper business.
Equinox Gold Corp. offers a gold-price and mine-ramp-up comparison for Barrick, producing gold that is refined and sold mainly to bullion banks, traders and refiners. Watch its Canadian Greenstone and Valentine mines, particularly Valentine’s producing first phase and planned second-phase expansion, for the mine-execution side of that comparison.
Centerra Gold Inc. shares exposure to Barrick’s two main earnings metals, gold and copper, through its operating mines. Mount Milligan’s gold-copper results provide the closer two-metal comparison, while Öksüt’s gold results isolate the gold side.
Eldorado Gold overlaps Barrick’s current gold earnings and copper-gold development plans, selling gold to refineries and developing Skouries while Barrick plans Reko Diq. Watch Skouries development and its planned gold-copper concentrate sales as a project-execution comparison, not as existing copper revenue.
Pan American Silver shares Barrick’s gold-price and precious-metal mining-cost exposure through mines across the Americas, but adds greater exposure to silver. Separate its gold results from its silver business when using it to judge conditions for Barrick’s gold operations.
Coeur Mining and Barrick both produce unrefined gold bars and gold concentrate for refiners and smelters, giving them shared gold-price exposure, though Coeur also has substantial silver exposure. Coeur’s Kensington gold-concentrate sales offer a more focused gold comparison than its combined gold-and-silver bullion sales to banks, trading houses and refiners.
EIA Crude Oil Stocks Change (Oct/16)
For Barrick, US crude-oil and gasoline stock levels indicate whether fuel supply is loosening or tightening, which can move diesel costs for its mines and change the cash left from selling gold and copper.
Read rising stocks as a sign that fuel supply may be easing, which could relieve pressure on Barrick’s mine diesel costs; falling stocks may signal tighter supply and more cost pressure.
Newmont Corporation earningsNEM
Newmont's report offers another owner’s view of Nevada Gold Mines and Pueblo Viejo, two shared operations that contribute gold to Barrick Mining.
Look at Newmont's reported production and costs at the shared mines, and note whether it gives an update on the Nevada Gold Mines dispute. Steady output and controlled costs would show those assets still contributing gold to Barrick; weaker output or higher costs would mean less production or economic value from the shared operations. Any disclosed change in the dispute could clarify the partnership risk, but operating figures alone cannot show that the dispute is resolved.
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. earningsAEM
Agnico Eagle's report gives Barrick Mining a close gold-mining cost comparison, helping separate broader cost pressure from issues more specific to Barrick.
Compare Agnico Eagle's gold sustaining costs and production with Barrick's. Both companies use non-IFRS cost measures, which are not standardized and may not be fully comparable. Lower costs with steady output at Agnico would suggest Barrick's cost pressure is more specific to its own mines; rising costs at both would point to pressure shared across gold mining. Barrick's own figures settle how its business is doing: the peer report supplies context, not a substitute.
Royal Gold Inc earningsRGLD
Royal Gold's report will show how much gold and silver Pueblo Viejo delivers under its agreement with Barrick Mining, offering a window into output from the linked mine.
Read Royal Gold's reported Pueblo Viejo deliveries separately from its related revenue: deliveries track metal handed over, while revenue also reflects metal prices and settlement timing. More deliveries mean more gold and silver moving through the agreement linked to Barrick, and support Barrick recognizing more of the upfront payment as deferred revenue over time; fewer deliveries mean less metal moving through that revenue path. Barrick has no delivery obligation when the mine has no production. The takeaway is whether deliveries from this mine are increasing, not a verdict on Barrick's overall results from Royal Gold's revenue alone.
Barrick Mining Corporation earningsThis company
Barrick Mining's report will show whether the prices it receives for gold and copper are translating into cash after mine production and costs.
Read realized gold prices alongside ounces sold and the cost per ounce of sustaining production; Barrick reports that cost as a non-IFRS measure, not a standardized accounting figure. Strong prices with steady sales and contained costs would show its mines converting gold prices into cash; lower sales or higher costs would eat into that benefit. Then check copper sales and unit costs: improvement there can offset pressure in gold, while weakness in both metals would leave cash generation more exposed. Operating cash flow shows whether those prices and mine results actually reached the cash line.