AQN in three months: buy, wait or sell?
Stop guessing. Get the call, a three-month target price, the best and worst cases, and a source for every claim.
- Buy / Wait / Sell rating
- 3-month target price
- Bear · Base · Bull
- vs. the market
What happened with AQN today?
No read yet
Uses news and trading volume to explain the day’s move and how it relates to the market.
Stop guessing. Get the call, a three-month target price, the best and worst cases, and a source for every claim.
Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. owns and operates utility systems that deliver electricity, natural gas and water to customers and collect and treat wastewater. Its regulated utilities generate nearly all of its revenue, mostly in the United States. Electricity is the largest revenue source, followed by natural gas, then water and wastewater services.
Customers pay bills at regulator-approved rates. These rates are designed to cover service costs and allow a return on approved investment in utility infrastructure. The company cannot freely set prices: recovering costs and earning that return depend on regulatory decisions, which can delay or deny recovery.
Algonquin sold its renewable energy business other than hydro and its Atlantica investment. It retains a small Canadian hydroelectric business that sells most of its electricity under long-term contracts.
The risk section is the longest, dullest part of the filing. This keeps only what can really hurt you: where it hits, how hard, when it plays out.
Every company claims an edge. Each one is checked against hard numbers like margins and returns: which hold, and which line gives way first.
Fortis Inc. and Algonquin both collect regulated utility bills across several regions, and they share a direct investment in Ontario’s Wataynikaneyap Power transmission project. Watch that project’s news: FortisOntario owns 39% and Algonquin 10% of the line connecting 17 remote First Nations communities to the grid.
Eversource Energy gives Algonquin holders a comparison under the same New Hampshire electricity and Massachusetts gas regulators; both companies charge customers for electricity, gas and water service. Watch Eversource’s rate decisions for those two businesses to assess the regulatory setting Algonquin also faces.
Emera Incorporated and Algonquin both rely on approved customer electricity and gas charges to recover service costs and earn returns on utility investment across North America and island markets. Watch Emera’s approved returns and investment included in rates, particularly at its Florida and Canadian electric utilities.
Black Hills Corporation offers a comparison for Algonquin’s electricity and gas businesses: both serve retail customers and meet electricity demand with their own generation and purchased power. Watch Black Hills’ long-term power purchases, which fill the gap when its regulated plants cannot cover customer needs.
Avista Corporation and Algonquin both charge customers for regulated electricity and natural gas service, combining owned generation with purchased power. Avista’s purchases and sales of power to match customer demand offer a comparison for how Algonquin manages electricity supply costs.
Alliant Energy Corporation and Algonquin share exposure to Iowa gas distribution regulation, alongside their regulated electricity businesses. Watch Alliant’s IPL gas service to Iowa retail customers rather than treating its Wisconsin operations as a direct geographic comparison.
CenterPoint Energy, Inc. and Algonquin both earn utility revenue from networks delivering electricity and natural gas to retail customers. CenterPoint’s Houston electricity delivery business offers a comparison focused on network service, while its Indiana electric business also generates power.
PPL Corporation and Algonquin both run regulated electric and gas utilities and buy electricity for customers who do not choose another supplier, recovering supply costs from customer bills. Watch cost recovery: PPL Electric passes supply costs through, while Algonquin’s Granite State recovery requires New Hampshire regulatory approval.
CMS Energy Corporation is a utility-led comparison for Algonquin: Consumers’ electricity and gas service supplies the substantial majority of CMS’s business, just as regulated utilities dominate Algonquin. Focus on Consumers’ utility revenue rather than NorthStar Clean Energy’s independent power business.
WEC Energy Group, Inc. and Algonquin both own regulated electric and gas utilities, with utility exposure in Illinois. For the Illinois comparison, distinguish WEC’s investment in ATC’s electricity transmission network from Algonquin’s gas distribution service to customers.
Duke Energy Corporation and Algonquin both depend on approved electricity and gas bills to recover service costs and earn returns on invested capital. Duke’s Ohio electricity business makes the distinction clear: it recovers purchased energy costs from customers but earns retail margin on transmission and distribution, not the energy itself.
The Southern Company and Algonquin share gas distribution exposure in Georgia and Illinois as well as regulated electricity businesses serving customers. Southern Company Gas’s news in those two states is the closer comparison for Algonquin’s gas operations than Southern’s wholesale electricity sales.
OGE Energy Corp.’s OG&E and Algonquin both sell electricity in Oklahoma and Arkansas under rates intended to recover service costs and provide approved capital returns. Watch OG&E’s fuel and purchased-power cost recovery, which passes actual costs to customers through separate mechanisms in each state.
American Electric Power Company, Inc. and Algonquin both generate and deliver electricity to paying customers, with utility earnings tied to regulated investment and approved rates. AEP’s regulated generation and network businesses are the relevant comparison, distinct from its Generation & Marketing segment.
DTE Energy Company and Algonquin both run electric and gas utilities, with customer electricity rates designed to recover costs and provide authorized investment returns. Watch DTE Electric’s rate decisions for its southeastern Michigan customers as a comparison for turning generation and purchased-power costs into approved bills.
National Grid PLC and Algonquin both collect regulated revenue from electricity and gas networks, including operations in the northeastern United States. National Grid’s US network investment is the closer comparison for Algonquin’s utility growth than its UK-to-Europe subsea electricity links.
FirstEnergy Corp. and Algonquin both rely on investment in regulated electricity distribution and transmission networks that deliver power to customers. Watch FirstEnergy’s Distribution and Stand-Alone Transmission results separately to compare customer delivery with the longer-distance grid business.
Entergy Corporation and Algonquin share Arkansas electricity regulation, with customer rates and utility investment shaping earnings. Watch Entergy Arkansas’s rate news for the closest comparison; Entergy’s utility business also sells electricity in Mississippi, Texas and Louisiana.
Dominion Energy, Inc and Algonquin are both predominantly regulated utility businesses, with electricity their largest utility activity. Dominion’s service to primarily electric customers in Virginia and the Carolinas is the relevant comparison, rather than its nonregulated generation under long-term contracts.
IDACORP, Inc.’s Idaho Power and Algonquin both generate and deliver electricity, with customer rates offering recovery of allowed costs and a regulated investment return. Watch Idaho Power’s rate outcomes and recovery timing: seeking higher rates does not guarantee full or prompt cost recovery or a specified return.
ONE GAS, INC. provides a gas-only comparison for Algonquin’s regulated delivery of natural gas to retail customers. Its entirely regulated distribution business serves primarily residential, commercial and transportation customers in Oklahoma, Kansas and Texas, rather than Algonquin’s broader electricity and water mix.
Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. and Algonquin both rely on approved gas distribution charges to recover costs and earn returns on utility investment. Watch the timing and size of Southwest Gas’s rate increases for residential, commercial and industrial service in Arizona, Nevada and California, which can materially affect its results.
York Water Co and Algonquin both charge customers for regulated water and wastewater service, with growth tied to infrastructure investment and service-territory expansion. Watch York Water’s approvals for acquiring or adding systems: it purifies and distributes drinking water and collects and treats wastewater, but expansion requires Pennsylvania regulatory approval.
CMS Energy Corporation earningsCMS
CMS Energy’s report will show how its core Consumers electricity and gas business is doing, giving a read-through on the regulated utility market that dominates Algonquin.
Focus on revenue and earnings from Consumers’ utility business, not NorthStar Clean Energy’s independent power business. If both strengthen, CMS’s regulated electricity and gas operations point to a firm utility backdrop relevant to Algonquin. If both weaken, they flag possible pressure in the sector, but do not establish how Algonquin itself performed.
FirstEnergy Corp. earningsFE
FirstEnergy will report distribution and stand-alone transmission separately, showing how regulated network investment is translating into service results that readers can compare with Algonquin’s networks.
Read FirstEnergy’s distribution and stand-alone transmission results separately. Strength in both says customer delivery and the longer-distance grid business are supporting results, a constructive comparison for Algonquin’s regulated networks. If distribution is weak while transmission is stronger, the two network businesses are diverging; transmission strength should not be treated as evidence that Algonquin’s customer-delivery business is also strong.
Fed Interest Rate Decision
For Algonquin, the Fed’s policy rate—the benchmark that influences borrowing costs across the economy—can change what it pays to refinance debt or borrow for its regulated utility operations, affecting interest expense and cash available for investment.
Expected4.0%Last release4.0%
If it comes in above expectations
If the policy rate is above expectations, debt that reprices and new borrowing may cost more, leaving Algonquin with higher interest expense and less cash for utility investment or other obligations.
If it comes in below expectations
If the policy rate is below expectations, debt that reprices and new borrowing may cost less, easing Algonquin’s interest burden and leaving more cash available for utility investment or other obligations.
York Water Co earningsYORW
York Water’s report will show how its regulated water and wastewater business is developing, a direct comparison for Algonquin’s water operations.
Read York Water’s water and wastewater revenue alongside any disclosed customer or system additions. If service revenue grows with customers or the system, expansion is adding business for this regulated water utility and offers a favorable comparison for Algonquin’s water operations; slower growth means less support from expansion. York Water needs regulatory approval to expand in Pennsylvania, so planned additions are not completed growth.
Fortis Inc. earningsFTS
If Fortis’s report updates the shared Wataynikaneyap transmission project, it will show what that project’s progress means for Algonquin’s 10% stake.
Look for an update on construction or operations of the Wataynikaneyap transmission line. Clear progress would show the line connecting 17 remote First Nations communities to the grid moving toward service, giving Algonquin’s 10% stake a clearer project basis; unclear or delayed progress leaves its contribution uncertain. If the report does not discuss the project, Fortis-wide results cannot establish how it is going.
Avista Corporation earningsAVA
Avista’s report will show how it uses power purchases and sales to meet customer demand and manage supply costs, a comparison for Algonquin’s electricity costs.
Read Avista’s power-purchase costs and sales alongside revenue from serving customers. If purchases and sales are well matched and applicable rate mechanisms recover costs, supply management is not visibly squeezing utility results. If supply costs rise faster than recovery, earnings may be pressured; that flags a cost-management issue relevant to Algonquin, though the companies’ systems and recovery arrangements differ.
Entergy Corporation earningsETR
Entergy’s report will show how its Arkansas electricity business is handling rates and cost recovery, a comparison for the regulatory setting Algonquin faces in Arkansas.
Focus on rate changes and approved cost recovery disclosed for Entergy Arkansas, and how its electricity earnings respond. If recovery keeps pace with service costs, Arkansas regulation is allowing a utility to recover costs more promptly; lagging recovery or weaker earnings would show how regulatory timing can weigh on returns. It is a same-state comparison for Algonquin, not evidence that the two companies have the same approved rates.
PPL Corporation earningsPPL
PPL’s report will show how it passes purchased-electricity costs to customers, a contrast with Algonquin’s recovery process that requires New Hampshire regulatory approval.
Read the electricity supply costs PPL passes to customers alongside its electric-business earnings. Timely bill recovery means purchased-power costs put less pressure on utility earnings; a lag leaves the utility carrying the gap for a time. PPL is a comparison: Algonquin’s New Hampshire recovery requires regulatory approval, so the two mechanisms are not the same.
Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp earningsThis company
Algonquin earns most of its revenue from regulated utilities, and this report will show whether utility sales after purchased energy and water costs are translating into stronger Regulated Services earnings.
Read Regulated Services’ Net Utility Sales alongside its net earnings. Net Utility Sales deducts purchased electricity, gas, water and other cost of sales; if both measures rise, utility growth is reaching earnings. If sales rise but net earnings stall or fall, costs, delayed rate recovery or other expenses may be absorbing the increase. Together, the figures show whether this core business is turning customer service into profit.