What happened with PSN today?
No read yet
Uses news and trading volume to explain the day’s move and how it relates to the market.
Stop guessing. Get the call, a three-month target price, the best and worst cases, and a source for every claim.
Parsons helps government agencies carry out defense and intelligence missions and helps public authorities and private owners develop infrastructure. Its Federal Solutions and Critical Infrastructure businesses contribute roughly equal shares of revenue. Federal Solutions supplies software, hardware, engineering and systems integration for work such as cyber operations and missile defense. Critical Infrastructure plans, designs and manages projects such as transportation networks and water systems for customers including Amtrak, CSX and transportation and water authorities worldwide.
Customers pay Parsons under contracts and related work orders, often spanning several years. Depending on the agreement, they reimburse costs plus a fee, pay for staff time or pay an agreed project price. Parsons collects payments as work progresses or specified milestones are reached; on fixed-price work, it keeps cost savings but bears overruns.
The U.S. federal government is its largest customer and supplies almost all Federal Solutions revenue. One group of federal customers accounts for a substantial share of company revenue. Continued work depends on government funding, contract renewals and new work orders; federal customers can also terminate contracts for convenience. Some assignments require security-cleared staff, and government conflict-of-interest rules can prevent Parsons from bidding for or performing particular work.
The risk section is the longest, dullest part of the filing. This keeps only what can really hurt you: where it hits, how hard, when it plays out.
Every company claims an edge. Each one is checked against hard numbers like margins and returns: which hold, and which line gives way first.
Parsons depends on federal mission-technology budgets and infrastructure investment; WSP is another infrastructure rival to watch beyond this list.
Leidos competes with Parsons for federal contracts in national-security systems, defense technology and civilian technical services, tying both to the same government budgets. Watch Leidos’s U.S. government contract revenue for a read on the funding behind Parsons’s federal work.
AECOM competes with Parsons for infrastructure design, engineering and program-management contracts in North America and the Middle East, earning fees from public and private clients. Its work in those regions is worth watching for the infrastructure investment that also supports Parsons.
CACI INTERNATIONAL CLA and Parsons sell cyber capabilities, engineering and specialized mission technology to overlapping U.S. government customers, so defense and intelligence spending matters to both. CACI’s contract wins for national-security technology are worth watching for demand and competitive pressure on Parsons.
Jacobs Solutions competes with Parsons for clients’ infrastructure planning, engineering and program-management work, including transportation, water and environmental projects. Watch its Infrastructure & Advanced Facilities revenue rather than the mission businesses it separated in 2024 for the closer comparison with Parsons.
Booz Allen Hamilton competes with Parsons to supply federal customers with cybersecurity, engineering, space and advanced technology solutions. Its federal cyber and defense-technology work is a useful place to watch the spending that supports—and the rivalry facing—Parsons’s national-security business.
Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) competes with Parsons to engineer systems, connect them to work together and provide mission technology for U.S. defense, intelligence and civilian agencies. Its Defense and Intelligence and Civilian revenue lines offer two views of the government demand behind Parsons’s Federal Solutions business.
Amentum Holdings, Inc. competes with Parsons to engineer, connect and operate systems for government defense, intelligence, space and environmental programs. Watch its direct U.S. government contract revenue for exposure to the federal funding that also supports Parsons’s mission services.
Tetra Tech competes with Parsons for government and commercial clients’ water-system engineering, environmental cleanup and infrastructure consulting work. Its water and wastewater projects are a concrete place to watch demand shared with Parsons’s water and environment business.
Stantec competes with Parsons to provide public and private clients with engineering, environmental consulting and project management for infrastructure and water developments. Watch its Water and Environmental Services work for the client investment that also matters to Parsons.
KBR, Inc. competes with Parsons for engineering, mission support and program management paid for by defense, intelligence, space and other government customers. Its Mission Technology Solutions business is the closer guide to this rivalry, rather than its separate industrial process-technology business.
ICF International, Inc. overlaps with Parsons in advising governments and putting environmental, infrastructure and civilian programs into practice. Its Energy, Environment, Infrastructure, and Disaster Recovery market is the part to watch for spending closest to Parsons’s infrastructure work.
CACI INTERNATIONAL CLA earningsCACI
CACI’s report will show government demand and competition for national-security technology work, the same kind of work Parsons’ Federal Solutions pursues.
Watch whether CACI’s national-security awards and revenue grow together. If both rise, agencies are still buying this work, but CACI is also winning contracts in the pool Parsons bids for: strong demand does not guarantee Parsons benefits. If both weaken, federal demand may be softening; CACI’s results alone cannot show whether Parsons is gaining share.
Parsons Corporation earningsThis company
Parsons’ federal business has been hurt by a major contract reduction, and this report will show whether infrastructure growth can offset it and new awards can replace completed work.
Read revenue and book-to-bill for both segments together; book-to-bill is awards divided by revenue recorded in the same period. Steadier Federal Solutions revenue, growth in Critical Infrastructure, and book-to-bill above 1 in both segments would show that new awards are replenishing work and infrastructure is helping fill the federal gap. If federal revenue keeps falling, infrastructure growth slows, and book-to-bill is below 1, new work is not replacing revenue as contracts run off.
Aecom earningsACM
AECOM’s report will show whether clients in North America and the Middle East are moving ahead with infrastructure design and engineering work that competes with Parsons’ Critical Infrastructure business.
Read AECOM’s infrastructure awards alongside its revenue. If both grow, clients in North America and the Middle East are still advancing projects, supporting the pool of work Parsons can pursue; AECOM is also a competitor, so stronger demand does not mean Parsons will win those contracts. If both weaken, fewer projects may be funded and available to bid on, putting pressure on growth in Parsons’ Critical Infrastructure business.
