KBR in three months: buy, wait or sell?
Stop guessing. Get the call, a three-month target price, the best and worst cases, and a source for every claim.
- Buy / Wait / Sell rating
- 3-month target price
- Bear · Base · Bull
- vs. the market
What happened with KBR today?
No read yet
Uses news and trading volume to explain the day’s move and how it relates to the market.
Stop guessing. Get the call, a three-month target price, the best and worst cases, and a source for every claim.
KBR, Inc. helps government agencies develop, integrate and operate systems for defense, intelligence, space and other missions. Its Mission Technology Solutions (MTS) business generates most of its revenue, serving primarily U.S., U.K. and Australian agencies as both a lead contractor and a subcontractor. Much of its U.S. government work reimburses allowable project costs and pays KBR an additional fee; other contracts pay agreed hourly rates or a fixed price for defined work.
Its Sustainable Technology Solutions (STS) business helps industrial customers turn raw materials into products and improve their facilities. Customers pay to license process technologies and buy associated equipment, catalysts and engineering services. These include ammonia production technologies such as K-Green. KBR also earns fees for planning, designing and managing projects and supporting facility operations.
The U.S. government supplies more than half of KBR’s revenue, so government funding, contract awards and renewals are central to the business. Security-sensitive work requires facility and employee clearances; without them, KBR may be unable to bid or perform. Industrial demand also depends on customers’ capital spending, while fixed-price work leaves KBR responsible for cost overruns. KBR has announced plans to spin off MTS into a separate publicly traded company, but completion remains subject to approvals and other conditions.
The risk section is the longest, dullest part of the filing. This keeps only what can really hurt you: where it hits, how hard, when it plays out.
Every company claims an edge. Each one is checked against hard numbers like margins and returns: which hold, and which line gives way first.
Amentum competes with KBR for government-funded engineering, intelligence, space, defense and operations work, from development through day-to-day mission support. Watch its U.S. government contract wins for signs of competition facing KBR’s government-services business.
Leidos competes with KBR to supply technical and mission services to U.S. agencies and defense customers in the United Kingdom and Australia. Its work for these government customers is the part to watch when assessing competition for KBR’s mission-support revenue.
SAIC competes with KBR for U.S. defense, intelligence and civilian agencies’ spending on engineering, connecting systems and supporting missions. Its Defense and Intelligence and Civilian segment results show how its business with these overlapping customer groups is developing.
CACI INTERNATIONAL CLA competes with KBR for government contracts covering engineering, intelligence analysis, cybersecurity and technical mission support. Watch its contract wins in analytics and cyber capabilities, where both companies sell expertise to government customers.
Booz Allen competes with KBR for federal defense and intelligence programs in engineering, cybersecurity, analytics, space and digital modernization. Its defense and intelligence work is more relevant to this rivalry than its commercial cyber products.
Parsons competes with KBR for government and commercial spending on defense, cyber, space, connecting systems and infrastructure engineering. Watch both its Federal Solutions and Critical Infrastructure businesses: the rivalry spans government missions and infrastructure rather than just one side of KBR.
Fluor competes with KBR for energy and chemicals customers’ engineering and facility-lifecycle work, and for governments’ logistics, operations and mission support. Its Energy Solutions and Mission Solutions results are the relevant businesses to watch, rather than treating all of Fluor as a match for KBR.
Jacobs Solutions competes with KBR for customers’ engineering, advisory and program-management work in energy security, industrial facilities and critical infrastructure, but has separated its mission-services business. Watch Infrastructure & Advanced Facilities rather than the discontinued mission businesses when comparing its results with KBR.
AECOM competes with KBR for government and commercial customers’ infrastructure advisory, engineering design and program-management work worldwide. Watch engagements that grow from initial planning into broader programs: AECOM earns fees for staff time on these projects.
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation earningsBAH
Booz Allen's defense and intelligence results show whether federal customers are also funding a direct competitor to KBR's largest mission business.
Watch the direction of Booz Allen's defense and intelligence revenue. Growth would show federal spending reaching a direct rival and could mean tougher competition for KBR's mission contracts; a decline would offer less evidence that this rival is expanding, but would not prove KBR is winning more work. The takeaway is whether a direct competitor is gaining ground, not that its growth automatically means KBR is losing business.
KBR, Inc. earningsThis company
KBR's MTS and STS results show whether its government mission work and process-technology services are turning revenue into profit.
Compare each segment's revenue with its operating income against the same quarter a year earlier. If both rise in MTS and STS, growth is reaching segment profit; if revenue rises but operating income stalls or falls, costs are consuming more of that growth, especially on fixed-price contracts where KBR bears overruns. The conclusion is whether both businesses are contributing or one is carrying the other.
JOLTs Job Openings (Sep)
Job openings track employers’ demand for workers; tighter labor supply can raise KBR’s hiring costs or make it harder to staff fixed-price contracts, where cost overruns can reduce profit.
Expected7.0MLast release7.079M
If it comes in above expectations
More openings could intensify competition for workers, raising KBR’s labor costs or leaving fixed-price contracts harder to staff, which may squeeze their profit.
If it comes in below expectations
If the reading is below the 7.0M estimate, it is below the previous 7.079M. Fewer openings could ease competition for workers, helping KBR contain labor costs and staff fixed-price contracts, which may support their profit.
Non Farm Payrolls (Oct)
The monthly jobs report tracks changes in employment; a tighter labor market can raise KBR’s labor costs or constrain staffing for fixed-price contracts, where overruns can cut profit.
If payrolls rise, read that as a stronger labor market that could raise KBR’s labor costs or constrain staffing for fixed-price contracts; if they fall, those pressures could ease.