What happened with ACM today?
No read yet
Uses news and trading volume to explain the day’s move and how it relates to the market.
Stop guessing. Get the call, a three-month target price, the best and worst cases, and a source for every claim.
AECOM helps clients turn infrastructure needs, such as transport networks, water systems and buildings, into planned and managed projects. Its engineers, architects and project managers take work from early advice and design through construction management; an initial assignment can grow into responsibility for several projects. Professional services generate nearly all its revenue, with most business in the Americas and additional operations worldwide.
Clients mainly pay for employees’ time on projects. AECOM also bills them for subcontracted work and other project costs, so not all money billed represents its own services. Earnings depend on managing delivery costs, particularly when it agrees to a fixed price or a maximum project price.
Governments and private clients both supply substantial revenue, with no single client dominating. The business depends on qualified staff and clients continuing to fund projects. Many government contracts need renewed budget appropriations, and government customers can cut back or end work. AECOM must comply with government procurement rules to remain eligible for contracts; some assignments also require security clearances or other government-granted eligibility.
The risk section is the longest, dullest part of the filing. This keeps only what can really hurt you: where it hits, how hard, when it plays out.
Every company claims an edge. Each one is checked against hard numbers like margins and returns: which hold, and which line gives way first.
AECOM’s results hinge on infrastructure and facilities investment; WSP is an important rival to watch that this list does not include.
Jacobs Solutions competes with AECOM for public and private clients’ spending on infrastructure, water, environmental and facilities design and program management. Its Infrastructure & Advanced Facilities revenue is the line to watch for demand in these shared markets.
Stantec and AECOM compete for public and private clients’ engineering, architecture and environmental consulting work on infrastructure, water and buildings. Stantec’s water and buildings work offers a view of the investment demand both serve.
Tetra Tech competes with AECOM for government and commercial contracts to advise, engineer and manage water, environmental and infrastructure projects. Watch its water and wastewater systems and environmental cleanup work for demand that also reaches AECOM.
Parsons’ Critical Infrastructure business competes with AECOM to plan, engineer and manage transportation, water and environmental projects for government and commercial customers. Watch that business rather than all of Parsons: it generated 49% of company revenue in fiscal 2025.
Tutor Perini Corporation’s Building business competes with AECOM’s Tishman and Hunt operations for public agencies’ and private customers’ large building construction and construction-management contracts. Its Building backlog is the relevant comparison for AECOM’s Americas Construction Management, which drove most of AECOM’s backlog increase in fiscal 2025.
Fluor competes with AECOM for clients’ infrastructure and facilities engineering and project-management work, but more of its business involves designing industrial projects, buying materials and building them. Its Urban Solutions infrastructure work is a closer comparison for AECOM than its oil, gas and chemicals projects.
ICF International, Inc. competes with AECOM for government and commercial clients’ advisory and implementation work on environmental, energy and infrastructure programs. Its work in Energy, Environment, Infrastructure and Disaster Recovery is the relevant area to watch, rather than its health and social programs.
Onterris, Inc. competes with AECOM to clean up environmental contamination for public and private clients. Most Onterris clients are private-sector, and it says regulation and public-health concerns typically make this spending non-discretionary—a useful distinction when watching demand for environmental remediation.
Parsons Corporation earningsPSN
Parsons’ Critical Infrastructure report will show whether clients are still spending on transportation, water and environmental projects that compete with AECOM’s services.
Compare Critical Infrastructure revenue with its backlog, the value of awarded work expected to be performed. Growth in both would show clients are advancing projects and awarding more in markets AECOM also serves; weakness in either would point to slower execution or new awards in those shared markets.
Fed Interest Rate Decision
AECOM’s consulting and project-management fees can weaken if higher borrowing costs lead clients to delay infrastructure projects, while rates on its variable-rate Credit Agreement can raise its interest expense.
Expected4.0%Last release4.0%
If it comes in above expectations
If the Fed’s decision signals higher borrowing costs, public and private clients may defer projects, slowing demand for AECOM’s services and the fees it bills as work progresses; interest on its variable-rate debt may also rise.
If it comes in below expectations
If the Fed’s decision signals lower borrowing costs, clients may be less inclined to defer projects, supporting demand for AECOM’s services and fees as work progresses; interest on its variable-rate debt may also ease.
Onterris, Inc. earningsONT
Onterris, Inc.’s report will show whether private clients keep paying for environmental cleanup, a market AECOM also serves.
Look at Onterris’ environmental-remediation revenue and its explanation of demand. Steady revenue would support the view that regulation and public-health needs keep some private clients funding cleanup, lending support to a market AECOM serves; a decline would show that client budgets can still delay projects despite those needs.
Aecom earningsThis company
AECOM’s report will show whether its project fees are turning into more profit after subcontractor and other pass-through costs are stripped out.
Read revenue excluding pass-through costs alongside gross and operating margins. Growth in that revenue with both margins rising would show that project fees and cost control are converting more work into profit; growth with margins falling would mean labor, subcontractor or delivery costs are eating into the gains.
