What happened with SCHW today?
No read yet
Uses news and trading volume to explain the day’s move and how it relates to the market.
Stop guessing. Get the call, a three-month target price, the best and worst cases, and a source for every claim.
The Charles Schwab Corporation helps individual investors trade, manage investments and hold cash, with its directly served investor business generating most revenue. It also holds assets and processes trades for clients of independent investment advisors. Schwab does not charge those advisors or their clients a custody fee; instead, it earns income from the assets and cash held on their behalf.
Client bank deposits and brokerage cash fund loans, including borrowing against investments, and purchases of investment securities. Schwab earns the difference between interest received and its funding costs, its largest source of revenue. Fees for managing investments and administering funds and accounts are the next-largest source and generally depend on client asset balances. Trading adds commissions and payments from venues that execute client orders. Schwab also places some uninvested client cash with TD Depository Institutions, which pay it deposit-account fees.
The business depends heavily on how much cash clients leave in deposit and brokerage accounts, the value of their investments and their trading activity. Moving cash into higher-yielding investments can reduce Schwab’s funding and income, while interest rates affect both asset yields and funding costs. The TD agreement limits how much deposited cash Schwab can move back to its own banks. Regulatory capital and liquidity requirements constrain balance-sheet growth, and rules limit transfers of capital from regulated subsidiaries to the parent company.
The risk section is the longest, dullest part of the filing. This keeps only what can really hurt you: where it hits, how hard, when it plays out.
Every company claims an edge. Each one is checked against hard numbers like margins and returns: which hold, and which line gives way first.
Schwab’s results turn on client cash, interest rates, investment balances and trading activity; privately held Fidelity and Vanguard are important rivals to watch beyond this list.
Interactive Brokers competes with Schwab for individual investors and independent investment advisors seeking low-cost trading and loans to buy securities. Its commission-free U.S. stock and ETF offering for participating U.S. customers is worth watching for pressure on Schwab’s brokerage pricing.
Morgan Stanley’s E*TRADE brokerage and wealth-management businesses compete with Schwab for individual investors’ trading accounts and assets they pay to have managed.
LPL Financial competes with Schwab to hold independent advisors’ client assets and earn revenue from managed accounts, securities transactions and client cash. Watch LPL’s fee-based advisory assets: Schwab earns mainly interest and asset-related fees from these advisor relationships, rather than charging a custody fee.
Raymond James competes with Schwab for individual investors’ assets through securities brokerage, investment management, banking and trust services. Its emphasis on service quality and product selection makes its retail investment business the part to watch, rather than its corporate deal work.
Robinhood competes with Schwab for U.S. retail brokerage accounts and the stock and options orders those customers generate.
Ameriprise competes with Schwab for individual investors’ brokerage, managed-investment and cash-management assets. Watch assets in its managed accounts, where clients pay fees based on account value—the same asset-balance exposure that matters to Schwab’s managed-investing fees.
Toronto Dominion Bank’s banks take cash swept from Schwab client accounts and pay Schwab deposit-account fees under a long-term agreement that continued after TD sold its Schwab stake. Watch deposits transferred back to Schwab: they reduce those fees but give Schwab funding to invest or replace borrowings.
Bank of America’s wealth-management business competes with Schwab for U.S. clients’ brokerage, retirement, managed-investment and banking assets. Its wealth-management client balances are the relevant measure to watch, rather than the bank’s overall customer count.
Webull competes with Schwab for retail brokerage accounts, and both receive payments for sending customer trades to execution venues. Watch Webull’s U.S. order-flow revenue: market makers and exchange partners pay it to execute those orders instead of customers paying brokerage commissions.
SEI Investments Co competes with Schwab for independent advisors who need client assets held safely, investments managed and technology to run their practices. Its Investment Advisors business is the relevant part to watch, rather than its broader technology and operations outsourcing revenue.
Stifel Financial Corp. and Schwab both serve individual investors with securities brokerage, financial planning, investment services and banking. Stifel’s private-client transaction and investment-service revenue is more relevant to this overlap than its institutional trading or investment-banking work.
Wealthfront competes with Schwab for investors’ cash and automated advisory accounts, earning bank-paid cash fees and asset-based advisory fees. Cash management produced about 74% of Wealthfront’s fiscal 2026 revenue: partner banks pay interest to clients, and Wealthfront keeps the remaining negotiated payment as its fee.
BlackRock competes with Schwab’s fund business for investors’ ETF, index-fund and cash-management allocations, with fees tied to the assets entrusted to its products. Watch assets in those strategies, rather than BlackRock’s total assets across all investment businesses, for the clearest comparison with Schwab’s fund fees.
LPL Financial Holdings Inc. earningsLPLA
LPL Financial’s report will show whether independent advisors’ fee-based assets are growing, a signal of the market in which Schwab competes to serve advisors and their clients.
Compare changes in LPL Financial’s fee-based advisory assets with net new client assets in Schwab’s Advisor Services business. Growth at LPL would show that advisor-client assets are expanding, creating room for Schwab to attract assets; a decline would point to weaker growth or tougher competition, making Schwab’s own advisor relationships and related revenue more important to watch.
Robinhood Markets, Inc. earningsHOOD
Robinhood’s report will show whether retail customers are opening accounts and trading stocks and options, the same customers and orders Schwab competes for.
Read Robinhood’s account growth alongside its stock and options trading activity. If both rise, retail trading demand is strong, sharpening Schwab’s competition for customers while increasing the pool of orders both firms seek; if both weaken, that pressure may ease, but the report does not establish what happened to Schwab’s own accounts or orders.
Fed Interest Rate Decision
For Schwab, Fed rate decisions change what its bank and brokerage businesses earn on client cash and loans versus what they pay to fund them, while also affecting fees tied to clients’ fund assets.
Expected4.0%Last release4.0%
If it comes in above expectations
If rates rise more than expected, Schwab may earn more on assets that reprice, but higher funding costs or clients shifting cash out of bank deposits can offset that; changes in fund values or fee waivers may also affect asset-management fees.
If it comes in below expectations
If rates fall more than expected, Schwab may earn less on assets that reprice, while funding costs and amounts paid to clients may also fall; lower funding costs can support interest revenue and bank deposit account fees, but the net effect depends on client cash shifts and asset yields.
Ameriprise Financial, Inc. earningsAMP
Ameriprise’s report will show whether client assets in fee-based managed accounts are growing, a read on demand in a market where Schwab also earns asset-based fees.
Read changes in Ameriprise’s managed-account assets alongside any reported client flows, since market movements can also change asset values. Rising assets with net inflows would point to continued willingness to pay for investment management, a supportive demand signal for Schwab’s fee-based managed solutions; falling assets or outflows would point to a tougher market for those assets, leaving Schwab’s own client flows central.
Webull Corporation earningsBULL
Webull’s report will show how its U.S. order-flow revenue moves with trading activity, a read on the payments Schwab also earns for routing customer orders.
Compare Webull’s U.S. order-flow revenue with its stock and options trading activity. Revenue rising with trading would show active order demand and continued payments for routed orders; if trading stays active but revenue weakens, monetization per order may be under pressure, a risk to the order-flow revenue Schwab also earns.
Toronto Dominion Bank earningsTD
TD’s report can offer clues about deposits moving between its banks and Schwab, which affects Schwab’s deposit-account fees and funding.
Watch for changes in TD’s reported deposit balances that relate to this arrangement, and compare them with the direction of Schwab’s deposit-account fees. Stable or higher balances would support that fee stream; balances moving back to Schwab could reduce the fees while giving Schwab funds to invest or use in place of borrowings. If TD does not disclose balances tied to the arrangement, its overall deposits cannot establish Schwab’s specific cash flows.
Wealthfront Corporation earningsWLTH
Wealthfront’s report will show demand for cash management and automated advice, services that compete for the cash and investment assets Schwab also serves.
Read changes in Wealthfront’s cash-management business separately from assets in automated advisory accounts. Growth in both would show clients choosing these services for cash and investments, intensifying competition for Schwab’s client cash and fee-based assets; if one grows while the other weakens, the competitive signal applies to that business, not necessarily to Schwab’s own balances or fees.
