What happened with LPLA today?
No read yet
Uses news and trading volume to explain the day’s move and how it relates to the market.
Stop guessing. Get the call, a three-month target price, the best and worst cases, and a source for every claim.
LPL Financial Holdings supplies the systems and account services that independent financial advisors and financial institutions use to serve American families. Its subsidiaries hold client assets, process securities trades and provide technology and compliance support, while advisors help clients invest and plan their finances.
Most revenue comes from fees and commissions generated by those advisors. Clients pay ongoing advisory fees based on account assets, while investment purchases and sales generate commissions from clients and product sponsors. LPL pays a substantial portion of these revenues to advisors. Independent registered investment-adviser firms instead retain their own advisory fees and pay LPL separately for technology, custody and related services.
Client cash programs are another significant source of revenue: LPL places cash in participating banks and money market accounts and earns fees tied to those balances. Product sponsors also pay LPL for access to its platform and account services. Cash-program earnings depend on interest rates, client balances and terms agreed with participating banks and fund providers.
The business depends on attracting and retaining advisors and the client assets they serve; asset values and investment activity affect fees and commissions. No single advisor practice or institution dominates advisory and commission revenue. Regulated subsidiaries must maintain required capital, which can limit operations and cash transfers to the holding company, and material changes to brokerage activities may require FINRA approval.
The risk section is the longest, dullest part of the filing. This keeps only what can really hurt you: where it hits, how hard, when it plays out.
Every company claims an edge. Each one is checked against hard numbers like margins and returns: which hold, and which line gives way first.
LPL’s results hinge on recruiting advisors, investment markets and rates earned on client cash placed with banks; Prudential also matters to the annuity sales growth highlighted in LPL’s filing.
Raymond James competes with LPL for advisors and retail clients’ investment assets: both provide investment advice, handle securities trades and distribute investment products to those clients.
Ameriprise competes with LPL for financial advisors and retail wealth clients, who generate advisory fees and investment-product commissions. Its ability to retain experienced, productive advisors is worth watching alongside LPL’s recruitment efforts.
Schwab competes with LPL for brokerage assets and for independent investment-advice firms that need client assets held and serviced, known as custody. Both companies’ earnings also depend on client cash balances and interest rates.
Stifel competes with LPL for financial advisors serving private clients and for households paying for brokerage, financial planning and investment services. Its Global Wealth Management business is the part to watch for this overlap, rather than its institutional trading and investment banking.
Morgan Stanley’s wealth-management business competes with LPL for financial advisors and individual clients buying investment services. Its news about attracting and retaining qualified staff is relevant to the competition LPL faces for advisors.
UBS’s U.S. wealth-management advisor network competes with LPL for advisors and affluent households’ investment assets, making its U.S. wealth business the relevant rival for LPL holders.
SEI competes with LPL to supply advisors with technology, services that hold client assets, and investment-management platforms. Its Investment Advisors segment is the revenue line to watch for this advisor-platform competition.
Interactive Brokers overlaps with LPL in serving registered investment advisors and individual investors, executing trades and completing the transfer of cash and securities for clients. Its low-cost, automated brokerage offering is what to watch when comparing the trading services available to those customers.
Bank of America’s wealth-management business competes with LPL’s advisors for clients’ brokerage, advisory and retirement assets. Its Global Wealth & Investment Management client balances are more relevant to that contest than the bank’s overall size.
Wells Fargo competes with LPL for financial advisors and household investment assets through its wealth-management and brokerage businesses. Its financial-planning and brokerage offerings to households are the relevant overlap, rather than its mortgage and commercial-lending businesses.
SEI Investments Co earningsSEIC
SEI Investments’ Investment Advisors business supplies advisors with technology, asset-holding services and investment platforms, so its report will show whether that offering is gaining business in the same market as LPL Financial.
Read SEI Investments’ Investment Advisors revenue alongside its explanation of changes in advisors and client assets using its platform. Growth tied to more advisors or assets using the service would point to stronger platform competition and potentially more pressure on LPL Financial to attract and retain advisors; weak revenue, or growth explained mainly by market movements, would provide less evidence of intensifying competition, but would not show that LPL is winning advisors.
LPL Financial Holdings Inc. earningsThis company
LPL Financial earns advisory fees on assets held on its platform, and this report will show whether new assets are lifting that revenue and how much advisor payouts and other costs leave as profit.
Compare organic net new advisory assets with advisory revenue, then weigh that revenue against advisor payouts and other costs. Rising net new assets and advisory revenue, with costs growing more slowly, would show that asset gathering is translating into better business results; weak flows or revenue alongside faster-rising costs would show that asset growth is not carrying through to profit. Advisory fees also move with markets and account contributions and withdrawals, so revenue changes cannot be attributed to new client assets alone.
Fed Interest Rate Decision
LPL earns revenue from client cash swept to banks or held in money-market funds, so the Fed’s rate decision can change the yields it receives and the revenue those balances generate.
Expected4.0%Last release4.0%
If it comes in above expectations
If rates are higher than expected, yields on client cash may rise and lift LPL’s cash-program revenue, but the gain depends on how clients divide cash among sweep and other options and on terms negotiated with banks and money-market providers.
If it comes in below expectations
If rates are lower than expected, yields on client cash may fall and reduce LPL’s cash-program revenue; the effect depends on clients’ cash choices and the terms negotiated with banks and money-market providers.
