What happened with OPY today?
No read yet
Uses news and trading volume to explain the day’s move and how it relates to the market.
Stop guessing. Get the call, a three-month target price, the best and worst cases, and a source for every claim.
Oppenheimer Holdings earns most of its revenue from helping wealthy individuals, families and businesses manage and invest their money. Clients pay fees based on the value of assets in advisory accounts or commissions when they trade through brokerage accounts. Advisory fees are the largest source of wealth-management revenue. The company also earns interest on loans secured by clients’ securities and fees from moving uninvested client cash into participating banks’ deposit accounts.
Its Capital Markets business helps emerging-growth and middle-market companies and financial sponsors raise capital and arrange acquisitions, mergers and restructurings. These clients pay underwriting and advisory fees, usually tied to completed transactions. Oppenheimer also executes stock and bond trades for institutional investors, earning commissions or a margin through the prices at which it buys and sells securities.
Revenue depends on the assets clients keep with the firm, their trading activity and the completion of corporate deals. Retaining financial advisers and other specialists matters because departing employees can take client relationships with them. Interest rates and client cash balances also affect lending and deposit-program income.
Securities regulation constrains activities such as trading, lending and handling client assets. Recommendations to brokerage clients must meet a best-interest standard, and capital requirements limit how the business operates.
The risk section is the longest, dullest part of the filing. This keeps only what can really hurt you: where it hits, how hard, when it plays out.
Every company claims an edge. Each one is checked against hard numbers like margins and returns: which hold, and which line gives way first.
Stifel Financial Corp. competes with Oppenheimer for private clients served by financial advisors, companies seeking deal advice or financing, and institutions trading securities. Its Global Wealth Management and Institutional Group results offer separate comparisons for Oppenheimer’s client-investment and capital-markets businesses.
Raymond James Financial, Inc. competes with Oppenheimer for private investors paying for investment management and brokerage, and companies seeking deal advice and help selling securities. Watch its investment-management, advisory and underwriting revenue rather than treating its banking business as a direct comparison.
Morgan Stanley competes with Oppenheimer to manage individuals’ investments and help corporate and institutional clients raise capital and trade securities. Its Wealth Management, Investment Management and Institutional Securities results provide distinct comparisons for those overlapping businesses.
Ameriprise Financial, Inc. competes with Oppenheimer through advisors who help retail clients trade securities and manage accounts for fees based on their assets. Watch its managed-account fees and advisor retention: Oppenheimer also charges asset-based advisory fees and says more clients have chosen fee-based accounts.
Piper Sandler Companies competes with Oppenheimer for fees from middle-market companies seeking deal advice or help raising money, and from institutions trading stocks and bonds. Its advisory and underwriting business is the relevant comparison for Oppenheimer’s corporate capital-markets work.
Jefferies Financial Group Inc. competes with Oppenheimer to advise clients, help them sell securities to raise money, and handle institutional stock and bond trading. Watch its Investment Banking and Capital Markets results for that overlap, rather than its alternative-investment management and own investments.
Goldman Sachs Group Inc. competes with Oppenheimer for companies’ advisory and securities-issuance fees, institutional trading business and wealth-management clients. Its advisory, equity and debt underwriting, and asset-management fees are more useful comparisons than its card business.
The Charles Schwab Corporation and Oppenheimer both earn fees tied to brokerage clients’ invested assets and interest-sensitive revenue tied to their cash, so client asset values, cash allocations and short-term rates matter to both. Watch Schwab’s asset-management fees, net interest revenue and bank deposit account fees alongside Oppenheimer’s advisory fees and cash-sweep income.
Evercore Inc. competes with Oppenheimer for fees from advising companies and helping them issue securities, but is much more concentrated in investment banking. Its Investment Banking & Equities segment produced 98% of 2025 revenue excluding Other Revenue, net; advisory and underwriting transaction fees are the relevant comparison for Oppenheimer.
Moelis & Company competes with Oppenheimer for corporate and financial-sponsor clients paying for merger, restructuring and financing advice. Its focus is advice rather than lending or securities trading, making its advisory revenue a more specific comparison for Oppenheimer’s deal-advisory fees.
Bank of America Corporation competes with Oppenheimer for private clients who pay for investment management and brokerage, and companies buying investment-banking services. Watch its Global Wealth & Investment Management client balances and corporate investment-banking business, rather than its broad consumer-banking footprint.
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. and Oppenheimer both earn brokerage revenue when clients trade securities and interest when they lend clients money to finance their holdings. Client trading and borrowing therefore link the two businesses, without making their service models identical.
Stifel Financial Corp. earningsSF
Stifel Financial Corp.’s report will show how client demand and competition are shaping wealth management and institutional capital markets, two businesses it shares with Oppenheimer.
Compare Stifel’s Global Wealth Management and Institutional Group with Oppenheimer’s Wealth Management and Capital Markets: look at fees and assets tied to client accounts, then at investment banking and institutional trading. Strength in both Stifel groups would indicate that clients in the businesses the firms share are paying for asset management, seeking deal services, and trading securities. Weakness would point to softer demand or tougher competition for Oppenheimer’s overlapping businesses. Their size and business mix differ, so compare the direction of results, not total amounts.
Fed Interest Rate Decision
Oppenheimer earns interest on securities-backed client loans and cash swept to banks, so the Fed’s policy-rate decision can change what it earns as those rates adjust.
Expected4.0%Last release4.0%
If it comes in above expectations
Higher rates can lift interest earned on repricing client loans and cash balances, while higher borrowing costs may also affect Oppenheimer’s funding; the net effect depends on balances and other market factors.
If it comes in below expectations
Lower rates can reduce interest earned as client loans and cash balances reprice, while lower borrowing costs may also ease Oppenheimer’s funding; the net effect depends on balances and other market factors.
Oppenheimer Holdings, Inc. earningsThis company
Oppenheimer’s report will show whether fees on client assets and transaction-driven businesses are both contributing, or whether deal activity alone is carrying revenue.
Read Wealth Management assets under management alongside advisory fees, then compare Capital Markets investment-banking revenue with compensation as a share of revenue. Rising managed assets and fees, contributions from investment banking, and a steady or falling compensation share would show both businesses adding revenue without labor costs absorbing the gains. If advisory fees stall, growth comes mainly from transactions, and compensation takes a larger share, the improvement rests on a narrower, more deal-dependent base.
