What happened with TALO today?
No read yet
Uses news and trading volume to explain the day’s move and how it relates to the market.
Stop guessing. Get the call, a three-month target price, the best and worst cases, and a source for every claim.
Talos Energy’s production comes mainly from deepwater fields in the U.S. Gulf of America. It sells output from fields it operates and fields run by other operators to oil and gas companies, traders and suppliers. Crude oil supplies most of its revenue; natural gas and liquids extracted during gas processing contribute much less. Shell Trading (US) Company, Exxon Mobil and Chevron together account for most sales, with Shell the largest customer. Talos also holds a non-operated interest in Mexico’s Zama field, operated by Harbour Energy.
Cash generation depends on how much Talos produces and the commodity prices it receives. Most sales use spot-market pricing rather than long-term fixed prices, so oil prices matter especially. Talos uses contracts covering part of its expected production to soften the effect of falling prices, though these can also limit gains when prices rise.
To sustain production as existing wells decline, Talos must find, develop or acquire replacement reserves. Offshore projects require substantial upfront spending and long development periods. U.S. federal offshore leases also require financial assurance for obligations such as plugging wells and removing facilities; failure to provide it can lead to suspended operations or canceled leases.
The risk section is the longest, dullest part of the filing. This keeps only what can really hurt you: where it hits, how hard, when it plays out.
Every company claims an edge. Each one is checked against hard numbers like margins and returns: which hold, and which line gives way first.
Talos depends chiefly on oil prices and Gulf offshore production, with Shell Trading, Exxon Mobil and Chevron buying 70% of its 2025 production revenues; the supplied Hornbeck entry contains Helix facts and establishes no Hornbeck relationship.
W&T Offshore competes with Talos for oil and gas sales from Gulf of America shelf and deepwater fields into overlapping markets. Its sales to third-party customers mostly use short contracts tied to daily or monthly prices, making its selling prices a useful comparison for Talos's Gulf production.
Kosmos Energy and Talos both rely heavily on oil sales and compete in overlapping crude markets through Gulf of America operations and deepwater development. Watch Kosmos's Gulf sales volumes rather than its whole business: the Gulf supplied 29% of its 2025 sales volumes measured in barrels of oil equivalent.
Murphy Oil competes with Talos by developing Gulf of America offshore oil fields and selling their production into overlapping U.S. crude markets.
Occidental Petroleum competes with Talos in overlapping oil and gas markets, with both producing oil in the Gulf of America. Occidental's Gulf oil business is the closer comparison for Talos than its broader operations across the United States, Middle East and North Africa.
Woodside Energy competes with Talos through Gulf of America deepwater oil operations that sell crude into Gulf Coast markets. Those oil operations are the relevant comparison, since liquefied natural gas is also a major Woodside business.
Talos pays Seadrill to drill offshore wells, contributing 11% of Seadrill's 2025 operating revenue. Seadrill operates drilling ships and rigs under contracts paid by the day or completed well, so its Talos contract news offers a direct view of Talos's offshore drilling activity.
Commodity prices drive both EOG Resources and Talos because both produce oil and gas and sell the output, despite operating in different regions. EOG's oil-selling margins offer a comparison for Talos's price exposure, not its Gulf offshore operations.
Devon Energy's cash generation shares Talos's exposure to crude prices: both sell oil-heavy production at market-sensitive prices. Devon produces onshore in the United States and sells to third parties, with even its longer-term oil contracts using variable prices rather than locking in a selling price.
Diamondback Energy's Permian oil output and Talos's offshore oil output depend on the same crude-price cycle, but their drilling economics differ. Diamondback develops onshore fields with horizontal wells and centralized facilities, so its cost efficiencies are not a direct guide to Talos's offshore costs.
SM Energy and Talos have similar earnings exposure to crude prices because both produce and sell oil and gas but receive more than four-fifths of production revenue from oil. Oil supplied 82% of SM Energy's 2025 production revenue, versus 88% for Talos before derivative effects.
Chord Energy's oil-focused Williston production and Talos's offshore output both earn revenue tied to market crude prices. Chord sells to refiners, marketers and other buyers, so watch its crude selling prices after regional and transportation adjustments when comparing Talos's own Gulf price differences.
California Resources and Talos both depend heavily on crude prices for cash generation because oil dominates their production. California Resources produces and sells oil and gas from California and Utah; oil accounted for 79% of its 2025 production measured in oil-equivalent barrels, versus 70% for Talos.
ConocoPhillips is a broad gauge of Talos's oil-price environment, not its Gulf operations: both produce and sell oil and gas at market-linked prices. Watch ConocoPhillips's realized crude prices, which its customer contracts adjust for location, quality and transportation.
Kosmos Energy Ltd. earningsKOS
Kosmos Energy’s Gulf sales volumes show how many barrels another deepwater producer is selling into crude markets that Talos Energy also serves.
Focus on Kosmos Energy’s Gulf sales volumes, not its whole business. Higher volumes mean more barrels from this deepwater producer are reaching a market Talos also serves, adding potential competition for Talos’s sales; lower volumes mean less direct competition from Kosmos, but do not prove Talos’s prices will rise.
Talos Energy, Inc. earningsThis company
Talos Energy earns most of its revenue by selling Gulf oil and gas, and this report shows whether realized prices and production turn into cash for deepwater development and well abandonment.
Read realized sales price per Boe, excluding derivatives, alongside production, operating cash flow, capital spending and plugging-and-abandonment spending. Steady prices and output with cash flow keeping pace with development and abandonment costs would show Talos’s Gulf business can support those demands; if prices or output weaken and cash falls behind, deepwater projects and abandonment obligations are more exposed to oil-price swings.
Seadrill Limited earningsSDRL
Talos Energy pays Seadrill to drill offshore wells, so Seadrill’s disclosed Talos contracts and work show Talos’s Gulf drilling activity and related costs.
If Seadrill discloses Talos contract activity or day rates—the charge for each day a rig works—read them together. Ongoing work at controlled rates would show Talos is advancing deepwater development while containing drilling costs; less work could reduce near-term drilling bills, while higher rates could raise project costs, and slower development could delay reserve replacement.
W&T Offshore, Inc. earningsWTI
W&T Offshore sells Gulf oil and gas under short-term, market-linked contracts, so its realized prices offer a check on the market Talos Energy sells into.
Look at W&T Offshore’s realized selling prices, keeping differences in location, commodity quality and transportation in view. Steady prices would suggest the market facing Gulf sellers remains supportive of Talos’s sales; weaker prices would point to more market pressure, though W&T’s prices are not Talos’s own.
