SLB in three months: buy, wait or sell?
Stop guessing. Get the call, a three-month target price, the best and worst cases, and a source for every claim.
- Buy / Wait / Sell rating
- 3-month target price
- Bear · Base · Bull
- vs. the market
What happened with SLB today?
No read yet
Uses news and trading volume to explain the day’s move and how it relates to the market.
Stop guessing. Get the call, a three-month target price, the best and worst cases, and a source for every claim.
SLB Limited helps national oil companies, large integrated oil companies and independent operators develop and run oil and gas fields. Customers pay it to evaluate underground reservoirs, plan and drill wells, and supply equipment and services that bring oil and gas to the surface and handle production. Well construction and production systems account for most of its revenue. Its SLB OneSubsea joint venture supplies equipment and services for production from offshore wells.
SLB also sells software that helps these customers model reservoirs, plan wells and manage operations. Customers buy subscriptions or perpetual licenses for its Delfi and Lumi cloud platforms and applications such as Petrel and Techlog. It also combines digital tools with field services to monitor wells remotely and automate operations.
Most revenue comes from outside North America, and no single customer dominates sales. Demand and pricing depend heavily on customers’ spending on oil and gas exploration, development and production, which in turn depends on energy prices, expected demand and access to capital. Sanctions also constrain parts of its business: in response to expanding international sanctions, SLB suspended new investment and technology deployment in Russia and halted product shipments into Russia from its facilities worldwide.
The risk section is the longest, dullest part of the filing. This keeps only what can really hurt you: where it hits, how hard, when it plays out.
Every company claims an edge. Each one is checked against hard numbers like margins and returns: which hold, and which line gives way first.
SLB’s results hinge chiefly on international oilfield investment; for its subsea business, also watch OneSubsea partners Aker Solutions and Subsea7, neither of which appears here.
Halliburton competes with SLB for oil producers’ spending on drilling, understanding reservoirs, preparing wells for production and improving output. Its Drilling and Evaluation and Completion and Production results show how those overlapping service markets are doing.
Baker Hughes competes with SLB to supply oilfield operators with well-building and reservoir-evaluation services, equipment to prepare wells for production and lift oil, production chemicals and subsea equipment. Watch its Oilfield Services & Equipment business rather than its broader industrial business for the closest comparison with SLB.
Weatherford competes internationally with SLB for oil and gas producers’ work in drilling, reservoir evaluation, well construction, preparing wells for production and servicing producing wells. Its Production and Intervention results offer a focused comparison for SLB’s services that improve output and recovery from existing fields.
TechnipFMC competes directly with SLB’s OneSubsea for systems that develop offshore oil and gas fields, and with SLB for surface production equipment. Its Subsea results are the closest read on the market for OneSubsea’s seabed production systems.
NOV competes with SLB for energy producers’ and drilling contractors’ worldwide purchases of drilling equipment, products that prepare wells for production, production equipment and automation technology. Its Energy Equipment results give a view of spending on large equipment and integrated systems, distinct from its shorter-cycle tools, rentals and consumables.
National Energy Services Reunited Corp. (NESR) competes with SLB for oil and gas companies’ drilling, reservoir-evaluation and production-service work in the Middle East and North Africa, an important SLB operating region. NESR’s revenue from drilling locations in that region gives a geographically focused view of this competition.
Core Laboratories competes with SLB worldwide to analyze reservoir rocks and fluids for oil and gas clients and help them prepare wells for production and recover more oil and gas. Its Reservoir Description business is the clearest comparison for SLB’s rock and fluid analysis services.
Patterson-UTI Energy competes with SLB to steer wells, supply drill bits and prepare wells for production for oil and gas producers, with a stronger U.S. emphasis. Its completion-services results offer a more U.S.-focused comparison for SLB’s work to improve well productivity.
Nabors competes with SLB to steer wells, take measurements during drilling, automate drilling and integrate rig equipment and services for oil and gas operators. Watch the services and equipment Nabors charges for on top of rig-and-crew fees, where the overlap with SLB is most direct.
Innovex International competes with SLB for oil and gas operators’ purchases of engineered products used to build wells, prepare them for production and keep them producing, across domestic and international markets.
Helmerich & Payne’s drilling rigs and SLB’s well-construction services both depend on oil and gas operators commissioning wells. H&P’s acquisition of KCA Deutag added land-drilling operations principally in the Middle East, making its International Solutions results more relevant to SLB’s geographic exposure.
Oceaneering shares SLB’s exposure to offshore projects: energy customers buy its underwater robotics and services alongside the drilling services and seabed production systems those projects require from SLB. Its Subsea Robotics results offer a focused view of activity supporting offshore drilling and field development.
Tenaris and SLB both depend on oil and gas operators investing in new wells: Tenaris supplies oilfield pipes, while SLB provides drilling and well-construction services.
Halliburton Company earningsHAL
Halliburton’s report on its Drilling and Evaluation and Completion and Production businesses will show how strongly oil and gas companies are spending in service markets that overlap with SLB’s.
Read Halliburton’s performance in those two businesses against SLB’s Well Construction, Reservoir Performance and Production Systems. Broad strength in the overlapping work may reflect supported customer spending; weakness may point to softer demand in those markets. A difference between the companies alone does not prove the market changed: one may also be winning work from the other.
Oceaneering International Inc. earningsOII
Oceaneering’s subsea-robotics business offers a read on offshore drilling and field-development activity, which also supports demand for SLB’s offshore drilling services and seabed production systems.
Look at revenue and operating performance in Subsea Robotics. If the business strengthens, it points to more robotics work on offshore projects and a more active project environment that could also support SLB’s related drilling services and seabed systems. If it weakens, offshore activity may be cooling. Robotics results, however, are not direct evidence of orders for SLB’s subsea systems.
SLB Limited earningsThis company
SLB’s report will show whether oil and gas companies’ spending on drilling and production is still supporting its well-construction and production-systems businesses.
Read revenue and profit performance in Well Construction alongside Production Systems. If both hold up, operators are still paying for drilling, well-preparation and production equipment and services, supporting SLB’s core businesses broadly. If one weakens while the other holds up, strength in one does not erase softer customer spending in the other; the pressure lies in the weakening business.
TechnipFMC plc earningsFTI
TechnipFMC’s Subsea business competes with SLB’s OneSubsea for offshore field-development projects, so its report will show demand and competition in that market.
Read TechnipFMC’s Subsea sales alongside its orders. Strength in both points to demand for equipment for subsea field development, a supportive market for SLB’s OneSubsea; weakness in both suggests customers may be slowing projects. If TechnipFMC is strong while the broader subsea market is not, its ability to win projects from competitors deserves closer attention.