KINS in three months: buy, wait or sell?
Stop guessing. Get the call, a three-month target price, the best and worst cases, and a source for every claim.
- Buy / Wait / Sell rating
- 3-month target price
- Bear · Base · Bull
- vs. the market
What happened with KINS today?
No read yet
Uses news and trading volume to explain the day’s move and how it relates to the market.
Stop guessing. Get the call, a three-month target price, the best and worst cases, and a source for every claim.
Kingstone Companies, Inc. is a holding company whose wholly owned insurer, Kingstone Insurance Company (KICO), supplies nearly all its revenue. Personal insurance, including homeowners coverage, dominates the business. Policyholders are mainly in downstate New York, and New York supplies nearly all the business. Customers buy coverage through appointed insurance agents and brokers rather than directly from KICO, so those intermediaries bring in new and renewal business.
Policyholders pay premiums for KICO to cover insured losses. Its insurance profit depends on premiums covering claims, selling costs and operating expenses. KICO also invests premiums while awaiting claim payments. It passes part of its premiums and insured risks to other insurers through reinsurance, which limits its exposure and provides commissions that help cover underwriting expenses. Its ability to write coverage therefore depends partly on obtaining affordable reinsurance; KICO remains responsible to policyholders even if a reinsurer fails to pay.
With the business concentrated in New York property coverage, weather losses and home repair costs matter to policy pricing and claims. State regulators can restrict rate changes, policy cancellations and non-renewals, while capital requirements can limit how much business KICO writes. The holding company relies principally on payments from KICO to meet its own cash needs, and state law limits the dividends the insurer can send upstream.
The risk section is the longest, dullest part of the filing. This keeps only what can really hurt you: where it hits, how hard, when it plays out.
Every company claims an edge. Each one is checked against hard numbers like margins and returns: which hold, and which line gives way first.
HERITAGE INSURANCE HOLDINGS INC and Kingstone both collect premiums for insuring residential property in eastern U.S. markets, so homeowners prices and insurers’ willingness to offer coverage influence both companies’ premium growth. Heritage’s residential premium growth is a useful comparison for Kingstone’s largely New York business.
Universal Insurance Holdings and Kingstone both rely on premiums from homeowners, so property claims and the cost of protecting those risks put similar pressure on their underwriting profits. Watch how much of Universal’s homeowners premiums remains after claims and expenses, rather than premium growth alone.
Travelers competes with Kingstone for homeowners’ premiums, making its home-insurance prices and willingness to accept risks relevant to Kingstone’s new policies and renewals. Watch Travelers’ homeowners pricing and coverage decisions, not its broader business-insurance results.
Allstate’s homeowners and renters prices and willingness to offer coverage shape the alternatives available to Kingstone’s paying customers. Changes in those products’ pricing and availability are the relevant competitive signal for Kingstone.
Hanover competes with Kingstone both for homeowners’ premiums and for independent agents to place customers’ policies with it. Hanover’s Personal Lines results and agency relationships matter because Kingstone also relies on agents and brokers rather than selling directly to consumers.
Cincinnati Financial competes with Kingstone for homeowners’ premiums and for independent agencies’ choice of insurer for their customers. Its commitment to remaining a consistent insurer for agents’ business makes its homeowners offering and agency relationships worth watching.
American Coastal Insurance Corporation shares Kingstone’s concentrated coastal-property exposure, but earns premiums from Florida residential associations and landlords rather than predominantly downstate New York homeowners. Its residential-building claims and the cost of transferring catastrophe losses to other insurers offer a comparison for Kingstone’s coastal risks, not a readout of the same customer market.
Palomar Holdings and Kingstone both need premiums on catastrophe-exposed property to cover the risk and the cost of paying other insurers to absorb losses. Watch Palomar’s earthquake and other property business for pricing and risk-protection costs relevant to Kingstone’s homeowners book, rather than its casualty or crop lines.
UNIVERSAL INSURANCE HLDG, INC. earningsUVE
Universal Insurance’s report will show how much of its homeowners premiums remains after claims and expenses, a read-through on similar underwriting cost pressures for Kingstone.
Look at Universal Insurance’s homeowners premiums against claims and expenses, not premium growth alone. If premiums continue to cover those costs as the business grows, that suggests room for profit in this kind of homeowners underwriting and is a constructive signal for Kingstone’s similar cost pressures. If claims and expenses consume more of the premiums, Kingstone’s homeowners underwriting faces a reason to watch for comparable pressure.
The Allstate Corporation earningsALL
Allstate’s report will show how its homeowners and renters prices and coverage shape the alternatives available to Kingstone’s customers.
Watch Allstate’s homeowners and renters pricing alongside how much coverage it is willing to offer. Higher prices or tighter availability leave households with fewer options and may ease competition for Kingstone; competitive prices and accessible coverage give Kingstone’s customers another choice and keep that competitive pressure in place.
Kingstone Companies, Inc. earningsThis company
Kingstone’s report will show whether premium growth, mostly in New York, leaves an underwriting profit after claims and underwriting expenses.
Read net premiums earned alongside the net combined ratio: the first reflects premiums recognized over the coverage period, while the second compares claims and underwriting expenses with those premiums; below 100% means underwriting profit before investment income. If earned premiums grow while the combined ratio holds steady or falls, and the underlying loss ratio—which excludes catastrophe losses and prior-year reserve changes—also holds or improves, growth is not being consumed by claims and expenses. If premiums grow but those ratios rise, underwriting costs are catching up with or outpacing the premiums.
Palomar Holdings, Inc. earningsPLMR
Palomar’s earthquake and other property business will show how catastrophe-protection costs compare with premiums, a useful reference for Kingstone’s catastrophe-exposed underwriting.
Compare pricing in Palomar’s earthquake and other property business with what it costs to transfer catastrophe risk to reinsurers. If premiums keep pace with that protection cost, catastrophe-exposed risks can still be priced to cover it—a constructive cost signal for Kingstone’s homeowners book. If protection costs rise faster, catastrophe reinsurance could also squeeze Kingstone’s underwriting profit.