EPD in three months: buy, wait or sell?
Stop guessing. Get the call, a three-month target price, the best and worst cases, and a source for every claim.
- Buy / Wait / Sell rating
- 3-month target price
- Bear · Base · Bull
- vs. the market
What happened with EPD today?
No read yet
Uses news and trading volume to explain the day’s move and how it relates to the market.
Stop guessing. Get the call, a three-month target price, the best and worst cases, and a source for every claim.
Enterprise Products Partners connects North American oil and gas producers with domestic buyers and export markets. Its largest contributor to operating earnings is its natural gas liquids business: it extracts liquids such as propane and ethane from natural gas, separates mixed liquids into individual products, and moves them through pipelines, storage and export terminals. Its Mont Belvieu facilities connect these steps. Producers and shippers pay for processing, volumes handled or capacity reserved; some processing contracts instead pay Enterprise with a share of the extracted products. The company also handles crude oil, natural gas, petrochemicals and refined fuels.
Product sales account for most revenue. Enterprise buys commodities from producers and other suppliers and sells and delivers them to customers, earning the difference between selling prices and purchase and delivery costs. These activities also bring volumes to its own infrastructure. Higher selling prices alone do not necessarily mean higher earnings because purchase costs can rise alongside them. Enterprise also makes petrochemical products, including propylene, with some production supported by long-term customer contracts.
The business depends on continued oil and gas production in the regions its network serves, demand for the products it handles, and customers’ use or reservation of capacity. Commodity prices also affect trading margins and some processing payments. Federal and state regulation limits rates and service terms on regulated pipelines, constraining what Enterprise can charge.
The risk section is the longest, dullest part of the filing. This keeps only what can really hurt you: where it hits, how hard, when it plays out.
Every company claims an edge. Each one is checked against hard numbers like margins and returns: which hold, and which line gives way first.
Enterprise Products Partners’ results hinge on hydrocarbon throughput and export demand; watch privately held trading customer Vitol, which accounted for 11.5% of its revenue in 2024.
Energy Transfer competes with Enterprise Products Partners for producers’ natural gas gathering and processing business and customers’ transportation, storage and marketing business in crude oil, refined products and liquids extracted from gas, known as NGLs. Watch its efforts to secure gas supplies on favorable terms: those supplies feed the processing and downstream services both companies offer.
Targa Resources competes with Enterprise Products Partners to gather and process producers’ gas, then move the extracted natural gas liquids through connected logistics networks. Watch Targa’s success in winning new producer supplies with its wellhead-to-market services, which compete with Enterprise’s processing, pipelines, storage and export access.
ONEOK competes with Enterprise Products Partners for customers across gas gathering and processing, natural gas liquids handling, gas pipelines, and crude oil and refined-product logistics. Watch its new processing, pipeline and storage capacity: ONEOK warns that infrastructure projects can shift supply volumes in the Mid-Continent, Rocky Mountains and Permian Basin.
MPLX competes with Enterprise Products Partners for natural gas and natural gas liquids services, as well as customers moving and storing crude oil and refined products by pipeline and inland waterways. Its relationship with MPC matters here: MPC relies primarily on MPLX to transport, store and distribute refined products from its refineries.
Plains All American Pipeline competes with Enterprise Products Partners to gather Permian crude and transport, store and sell it through refinery and export gateways. Its crude transportation and terminal revenue shows what shippers pay for pipeline capacity, storage and loading services—the same business Enterprise pursues.
Kinder Morgan competes with Enterprise Products Partners for U.S. customers needing natural gas transportation, processing and storage, or petroleum-product pipelines and terminals. Watch its gas pipeline and storage network’s access to supply areas and consumers, where Enterprise also earns fees from volumes handled and capacity reserved.
Williams competes with Enterprise Products Partners to gather, process, transport and store U.S. natural gas, and to separate mixed natural gas liquids into individual products and store them. Watch Williams’ gathered and treated gas volumes, on which producers generally pay fees: they show activity in the services both companies sell.
Western Midstream Partners competes with Enterprise Products Partners for producers’ gas gathering and processing volumes in Texas, New Mexico and the Rocky Mountains. Watch its Delaware Basin business, where it moves customers’ gas from wells into treatment and processing; Enterprise’s Delaware gathering results also depend on volumes and fees.
Kinetik competes with Enterprise Products Partners for Permian producers’ gas gathering and processing business and for transporting gas and extracted natural gas liquids toward Gulf Coast markets. Watch the pricing and reliability Kinetik offers when competing for supplies not tied to its facilities by acreage agreements; those are concrete levers in the contest for processing volumes.
Enbridge competes with Enterprise Products Partners for shippers moving, storing and exporting North American crude oil, and for natural gas transportation business. Its Liquids Pipelines business is the part to watch for crude flows through Canadian and U.S. pipelines and terminals, rather than its utility or renewable-power operations.
Pembina Pipeline and Enterprise Products Partners both depend on North American production and demand for routes to market, earning from networks that gather, process and move producers’ gas and liquids. Pembina’s Canadian-centered pipelines, processing facilities and export terminals offer another view of the throughput demand supporting Enterprise’s integrated network.
Plains GP Holdings gives investors exposure to Plains All American, whose Permian crude gathering, pipelines and terminals compete with Enterprise Products Partners for shipper business. It has no direct operating assets and receives cash indirectly from Plains All American’s distributions, so watch the underlying transportation contracts and volumes rather than treating it as a separate pipeline operator.
South Bow competes with Enterprise Products Partners for contracts to deliver customers’ crude oil to U.S. Gulf Coast refineries. Watch its long-term capacity commitments: customers generally pay fixed monthly amounts for reserved space regardless of actual transported volumes, so those contracts matter more than throughput alone.
Kinder Morgan, Inc. earningsKMI
Kinder Morgan’s report will show how well its gas pipeline and storage network connects supply with customers, a test of the competition Enterprise Products Partners faces for transportation and storage business.
Look at use of Kinder Morgan’s gas pipelines and storage alongside Enterprise Products Partners’ own gas transportation volumes and segment margin. Greater use of Kinder Morgan’s network shows customers are using competing routes, but does not by itself mean those flows came from Enterprise; if Enterprise’s volumes and margin also grow, demand may be supporting both networks. If Kinder Morgan strengthens while Enterprise weakens, customer diversion becomes a more important possibility. The comparison helps separate competitive pressure from broader demand.
EIA Crude Oil Stocks Change (Oct/16)
For Enterprise, US crude-oil and gasoline stocks show how much oil and fuel is in storage; looser or tighter supply can change the prices and marketing margins on crude and refined products it sells, though hedging and comparable purchase costs can mute the effect.
A larger inventory build points to looser supply and may pressure Enterprise’s crude and refined-products marketing margins; a draw points to tighter supply and may support them, though hedging and purchase costs can mute either effect.
Oneok, Inc. earningsOKE
ONEOK’s report will show whether its new processing, pipeline and storage capacity is drawing more basin flows, revealing the supply and competitive conditions Enterprise Products Partners faces in gas and NGL services.
Read ONEOK’s new capacity alongside the volumes it actually processes and transports. More flows using new assets would show active basin supply, while also giving ONEOK more capacity to compete for gas and NGLs that Enterprise Products Partners handles. If capacity grows but use does not follow, new infrastructure may be competing for limited flows. Enterprise’s own volumes and segment margin help show whether the result points more to expanding basin activity or intensifying competition.
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. earningsThis company
Enterprise Products Partners earns fees from pipelines, processing and storage, as well as margins from marketing energy products; this report will show whether handled volumes are turning into stronger segment earnings.
Read each segment’s gross operating margin alongside the volumes it transports or processes. Gross operating margin is Enterprise’s measure of core operating profitability; service margins rising with volumes would show its pipelines and facilities turning more flows into fee income. If volumes hold or rise while margins weaken, costs, business mix or marketing margins may be absorbing the activity. Product-marketing margins help show whether earnings are being carried by network services or depend more on market opportunities.
Western Midstream Partners, LP earningsWES
Western Midstream’s report will show its Delaware Basin gas-gathering and processing volumes and fees, a direct read on the competition Enterprise Products Partners faces in that business.
Compare Western Midstream’s Delaware Basin gathering volumes and fees with Enterprise’s own Delaware gathering volumes and natural-gas segment margin. Growth at both would suggest producers are sending more gas into the area and demand may support both; Western Midstream growing while Enterprise stalls could mean the competitor is winning more producer flows. If Enterprise holds up while Western Midstream weakens, Enterprise is in the stronger relative position. The key is which business turns local gas volumes into fees and margin, not just how much the basin produces.
South Bow Corporation earningsSOBO
South Bow’s report will show whether shippers are still committing to reserve crude-oil pipeline capacity to U.S. Gulf Coast refineries, revealing the competition Enterprise Products Partners faces for similar flows and capacity contracts.
Look at South Bow’s long-term capacity commitments alongside Enterprise’s crude-oil transportation volumes and segment margin. Shippers paying monthly to reserve space, even when actual throughput varies, shows they value the route and available capacity; those contracts also support capacity-fee income. If commitments weaken while Enterprise’s crude business holds up, Enterprise is in a stronger relative position. If South Bow’s commitments remain firm while Enterprise’s related business weakens, competition for crude flows and capacity fees deserves closer attention.