PBA in three months: buy, wait or sell?
Stop guessing. Get the call, a three-month target price, the best and worst cases, and a source for every claim.
- Buy / Wait / Sell rating
- 3-month target price
- Bear · Base · Bull
- vs. the market
What happened with PBA today?
No read yet
Uses news and trading volume to explain the day’s move and how it relates to the market.
Stop guessing. Get the call, a three-month target price, the best and worst cases, and a source for every claim.
Pembina Pipeline Corporation connects oil and gas production with refineries, industrial users and markets in Canada and the United States. Producers and other energy companies pay it to gather and process gas, separate natural gas liquids into saleable products, and transport and store those products. Its connected pipelines, plants and terminals let customers use several services along that route. Many contracts require customers to pay for reserved capacity even when they do not use it; other fees depend on volumes handled.
Pembina also buys oil, gas and natural gas liquids and resells them using its own and third-party transport and storage capacity. Commodity marketing generates the largest share of sales revenue, while fee-based contracts supply most operating cash flow. Marketing margins depend on purchase and sale prices and price differences between products and locations.
Most assets are in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin, so demand depends on production there and access to downstream markets, including through third-party infrastructure. One customer accounts for a significant share of revenue. Pipeline construction and operation require regulatory approvals, and regulators can constrain tolls and service terms.
The risk section is the longest, dullest part of the filing. This keeps only what can really hurt you: where it hits, how hard, when it plays out.
Every company claims an edge. Each one is checked against hard numbers like margins and returns: which hold, and which line gives way first.
Pembina relies chiefly on contracted western Canadian hydrocarbon infrastructure, but also watch AltaGas: Pembina has secured propane export capacity at its Ridley Island facilities.
Enbridge competes with Pembina for customers paying to transport and store Canadian crude oil and move western Canadian gas to U.S. markets. Its BC Pipeline offers a Pacific Northwest route, while Pembina’s Alliance carries gas to the Chicago area.
TC Energy competes with Pembina for western Canadian producers paying to ship gas to the U.S. Midwest through Northern Border rather than Alliance. Watch Northern Border’s position with those producers; Alliance’s route to Chicago also lets Pembina extract natural gas liquids before delivering the gas onward.
South Bow competes with Pembina for western Canadian producers’ contracted crude-oil transportation business. Watch its long-term capacity bookings: customers generally pay fixed monthly amounts for reserved space even when they ship less oil.
ONEOK competes with Pembina for producers paying to gather and process gas and transport natural gas liquids in overlapping North American markets, including the Williston Basin.
Enterprise Products Partners competes with Pembina for producers and commodity marketers paying to move, separate and store natural gas liquids and reach export markets. Watch its connected NGL pipelines, separation plants and export terminals—the same services Pembina uses to compete for supply and contracts.
Ovintiv supports Pembina’s service revenue by paying for Dawson gas processing and committing to Cedar LNG capacity. The oil and gas producer has booked 0.5 million tonnes a year for 20 years, with payment required even if it does not use the capacity.
Canadian Natural supports Pembina’s contracted transportation revenue by paying to move its Horizon oil sands production under a long-term pipeline contract that provides Pembina a fixed return.
Suncor supports Pembina’s contracted transportation business by shipping its Syncrude oil sands production through Pembina’s Alberta Oil Sands Pipeline. The long-term contract covers the pipeline’s service costs, so Syncrude production changes are not a simple guide to Pembina’s earnings.
Plains competes with Pembina for customers paying to transport, store and load crude oil across North American producing regions and market hubs, and both also buy and sell oil. Watch Plains’ transportation and storage fees alongside its oil-trading revenue, since trading also helps fill its infrastructure.
Targa and Pembina both serve producers by gathering and processing liquids-rich gas, then selling the extracted natural gas liquids through connected networks. Watch NGL demand and the value of those liquids relative to natural gas: that price gap affects Pembina’s extraction and marketing cash flow.
Energy Transfer and Pembina both earn money serving energy producers and markets through connected gas, crude-oil and natural gas liquids transport, processing, storage and trading businesses. Watch infrastructure use as production and demand change; lower volumes directly reduce Pembina’s revenue where customers have not committed to pay for reserved capacity.
Kinder Morgan and Pembina share exposure to demand for paid gas transportation, storage and processing services linking producers with consuming markets. Watch Kinder Morgan’s gas-pipeline business for changes in that demand; Pembina’s contracts without minimum payment commitments are more directly exposed to falling transported volumes.
Kinder Morgan, Inc. earningsKMI
Kinder Morgan's gas-pipeline business shows demand for paid transportation, storage and processing, while falling volumes pose greater risk to Pembina where contracts lack minimum payment commitments.
Look at whether Kinder Morgan's gas-pipeline volumes and related fee revenue hold together. If both do, the market is still paying to move gas, a supportive demand signal for Pembina's services; if both weaken, demand may be cooling, and Pembina's contracts without minimum payments leave it more directly exposed to falling volumes.
EIA Crude Oil Stocks Change (Oct/16)
U.S. crude and gasoline stock reports track how much oil and fuel is in storage, and price and location shifts can make Pembina’s crude-oil buying and selling more or less profitable.
Read the stock levels for what they suggest about supply: fuller storage can weigh on prices, while leaner storage can support them, affecting prices and regional gaps that shape Pembina’s crude-trading margins.
Oneok, Inc. earningsOKE
ONEOK gathers and processes gas and transports natural gas liquids in overlapping markets, so its results show both demand for those services and the competition Pembina faces for producers' business.
Read ONEOK's gathering and processing volumes alongside related service earnings. Growth in both would show that producers are still buying these services, but ONEOK is also competing for that business, so Pembina faces an active rival. If both fall, producer activity and service demand may be softening; that would not by itself mean Pembina is winning customers.
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. earningsEPD
Enterprise Products Partners operates NGL pipelines, separation plants and export terminals, and its report shows whether shippers are using services that compete with Pembina for supply and contracts.
Look at Enterprise Products Partners' NGL volumes alongside use of its separation and export facilities. Strength across both would show that producers and marketers are paying for this chain of services, while Pembina must compete for supply and contracts. Weakness in both would point to cooling activity and demand across this part of the NGL business.
South Bow Corporation earningsSOBO
South Bow competes with Pembina for western Canadian crude shippers' long-term contracts, and its capacity bookings and fee income show whether shippers still pay to reserve pipeline space.
Read South Bow's long-term capacity bookings alongside transportation fee income. Steady bookings and fees would show that shippers still pay to reserve space, supporting demand for crude-pipeline contracts but confirming that Pembina has a competitor for that business. Fewer bookings or weaker fees would point to less producer commitment to pipeline capacity.
PEMBINA PIPELINE CORPORATION earningsThis company
Pembina earns fees from pipelines and facilities and also trades commodities; this report will show whether its infrastructure business can cushion swings in commodity markets.
Compare adjusted EBITDA—the company’s measure of operating earnings after specified adjustments—from Pipelines and Facilities with Marketing & New Ventures, then check operating cash flow. Steady infrastructure results and cash flow, even as marketing fluctuates, would show that fee-based assets are cushioning commodity swings. If infrastructure earnings and cash flow both weaken, the cushion may be failing and less cash may be available for operations, investment and dividends.
Targa Resources Corp. earningsTRGP
Targa Resources also extracts and sells NGLs from liquids-rich gas, so its results show how NGL demand and value relative to natural gas affect a business Pembina also runs.
Compare Targa Resources' gas-processing volumes with its NGL-related margins. Steady volumes and stronger margins would show that demand and the value of liquids relative to natural gas are supporting extraction economics, a helpful signal for Pembina's related cash flow. If volumes hold but margins narrow, price spreads are squeezing returns despite continued service activity.
TC Energy Corporation earningsTRP
TC Energy's Northern Border pipeline competes with Pembina's Alliance route for western Canadian gas moving to the U.S. Midwest, and its volumes show the pull of that alternative.
Look at Northern Border's gas volumes and shippers' reserved capacity. If both strengthen, more gas or long-term commitments are flowing to the competing route, potentially making it harder for Pembina's Alliance to attract shippers. If both weaken, competitive pressure may ease, but that alone would not show that Alliance volumes are rising.