What happened with QRHC today?
No read yet
Uses news and trading volume to explain the day’s move and how it relates to the market.
Stop guessing. Get the call, a three-month target price, the best and worst cases, and a source for every claim.
Quest Resource Holding Corporation helps businesses, particularly large customers with multiple locations, arrange waste collection, recycling and disposal, mainly in the United States. It coordinates a national network of outside providers and tracks and reports on their work rather than operating its own hauling fleet, processing facilities or landfills.
Customers generally pay monthly under multi-year contracts. Quest earns through agreed service pricing, management fees or a share of savings, and also receives proceeds from selling recovered materials. Waste and recycling services account for most revenue; product sales are a small part of the business.
Revenue relies heavily on its largest customers, with one customer supplying a substantial share. Contracts generally do not guarantee long-term volumes, and customers can reduce or cancel services. Delivery depends on outside providers meeting cost, quality and timing requirements, while recovered-material prices affect revenue. Environmental and transport rules also govern what materials providers can handle, where they can send them and whether they must recycle rather than use landfills.
The risk section is the longest, dullest part of the filing. This keeps only what can really hurt you: where it hits, how hard, when it plays out.
Every company claims an edge. Each one is checked against hard numbers like margins and returns: which hold, and which line gives way first.
Waste Management competes with Quest for businesses paying for waste collection, recycling and disposal, with greater resources to offer comparable services at lower prices. Watch its commercial and industrial collection pricing and any push further into recycling for pressure on Quest’s contracts.
Republic Services competes with Quest for businesses’ waste collection, recycling and disposal contracts, but owns trucks and facilities where Quest generally arranges outside providers. Its efforts to add customers and services under long-term contracts are worth watching for competition against Quest’s recurring business revenue.
Avalon Holdings Corp. competes with Quest by arranging tailored, cost-efficient waste disposal for paying customers rather than relying solely on its own facilities. Watch its waste disposal brokerage and management business for disposal-price increases it cannot pass on to customers—a concrete risk in this service model.
Casella Waste Systems competes with Quest for commercial and industrial customers paying for waste collection, recycling and disposal within Casella’s eastern U.S. footprint. Its commercial and industrial collection agreements, most lasting one to five years, offer a regional comparison for Quest’s multi-year customer contracts.
Waste Connections and Quest both earn fees from U.S. commercial and industrial customers for waste collection, disposal and recycling. Watch Waste Connections’ commercial and industrial service agreements; its oil-and-gas waste treatment and Pacific Northwest intermodal services are less direct comparisons for Quest.
GFL Environmental and Quest both rely on recurring contracts with U.S. commercial and industrial customers paying for waste collection, recycling and disposal. Watch GFL’s contract renewals and efforts to raise prices and surcharges to offset costs as a comparison for Quest’s recurring service business.
Waste Management, Inc. earningsWM
Waste Management's report will show how strongly it competes on collection pricing and recycling for commercial and industrial customers, business it shares with Quest Resource Holding.
Read Waste Management's commercial and industrial collection pricing alongside its recycling business. Strength in both would give customers a capable alternative and make it harder for Quest Resource Holding to win contracts or hold prices; weakness in those areas would point to less competitive pressure on Quest.
GFL Environmental Inc. earningsGFL
GFL Environmental's report will show whether commercial and industrial customers renew as prices and surcharges rise, a comparison for Quest Resource Holding's ability to recover service costs.
Read contract renewals alongside price increases and surcharges. If GFL Environmental keeps customers as charges rise, customers may be accepting cost recovery, which would support Quest Resource Holding's ability to protect contract economics. If renewals weaken as charges rise, customers may resist higher costs, making it harder for Quest to pass on what it pays outside providers.
Quest Resource Holding Corporation earningsThis company
Quest Resource Holding earns service revenue from business customers while outside providers handle much of the collection and processing, so its report will show whether that work leaves cash after service costs.
Read service revenue alongside cash from operating activities. Steady or rising service revenue with positive operating cash flow shows that customer programs are generating cash after the cost of outsourced services, leaving cash for operations and debt service. Falling service revenue with negative operating cash flow points to weaker contract economics or higher service costs and less room to meet debt obligations.
