What happened with PJT today?
No read yet
Uses news and trading volume to explain the day’s move and how it relates to the market.
Stop guessing. Get the call, a three-month target price, the best and worst cases, and a source for every claim.
Companies hire PJT Partners Inc. to help them buy or sell businesses, raise capital and address debt problems; investors and creditors also hire it for advice on these transactions. Strategic Advisory handles mergers and acquisitions and other corporate decisions, while Restructuring and Special Situations helps clients renegotiate debt and navigate financial distress. Advisory fees provide most revenue, with clients paying retainers, completion fees or capital-raising fees depending on the engagement.
PJT Park Hill helps private-fund managers raise money from investors and helps fund managers and investors obtain liquidity from private investments. Clients pay it for fundraising and related advice, making this business dependent on investors’ willingness and ability to commit capital. Some public pension investors prohibit placement agents, and placement-agent rules can restrict its work or fees.
PJT depends on its bankers’ client relationships and on winning new assignments, rather than mostly on long-term contracts. Many fees depend on transactions closing, so a few engagements and their timing can materially affect revenue. Weak markets can reduce dealmaking and fundraising, while stronger conditions can reduce demand for restructuring advice.
The risk section is the longest, dullest part of the filing. This keeps only what can really hurt you: where it hits, how hard, when it plays out.
Every company claims an edge. Each one is checked against hard numbers like margins and returns: which hold, and which line gives way first.
Moelis competes with PJT Partners for fees from companies and financial sponsors seeking advice on deals, debt restructuring, financing and private capital. Its advisory business offers a close comparison across these services, rather than lending or securities trading.
Houlihan Lokey competes with PJT Partners for clients paying for help with M&A, raising capital and restructuring corporate debt. Watch its Corporate Finance and Financial Restructuring businesses separately: they cover the deal and debt-restructuring work that overlaps with PJT.
Evercore competes with PJT Partners for fees from corporations and financial sponsors seeking independent advice on transactions. Its client fees from advisory and securities-issuance work are worth watching alongside PJT's engagement activity, since PJT's revenue depends on the number, size and complexity of assignments.
Perella Weinberg Partners and PJT Partners seek fees from overlapping corporate, financial-sponsor and creditor clients for M&A, restructuring and private-capital advice. Its work helping private funds raise money is the area to compare with PJT Park Hill's fundraising business.
Lazard competes with PJT Partners for corporate financial-advisory fees, but its asset-management business makes total revenue a less direct comparison. Focus on Financial Advisory, where Lazard must negotiate and win each revenue-generating assignment rather than rely on long-term revenue contracts.
Lincoln International competes with PJT Partners for fees from financial sponsors on M&A, restructuring, private-fundraising and fund-manager-led sales of existing investments, known as GP-led secondaries. Its Private Funds Advisory business is the closest area to watch against PJT Park Hill's fundraising and portfolio-liquidity work.
Piper Sandler competes with PJT Partners for corporate and financial-sponsor fees on M&A, restructuring, privately raising capital and private-capital advice. Its focus on middle-market clients makes that customer group's deal and financing work the relevant comparison, rather than its government and nonprofit business.
Jefferies competes with PJT Partners for fees from companies seeking financial advice and help raising capital, but it also runs substantial trading businesses. Its advisory and securities-issuance work is the relevant comparison for PJT, not the combined results of trading and asset management.
Goldman Sachs competes with PJT Partners for corporate fees from transaction advice and capital raising, while its investment-banking results also offer a broader view of the deal market. Watch advisory fees and fees for helping clients issue shares and debt, rather than the whole Global Banking & Markets segment, which also includes trading and lending.
Evercore Inc. earningsEVR
Evercore's report shows whether companies and financial sponsors are paying for transaction advice and securities issuance, the assignment market PJT Partners also competes in.
Read the trend in Evercore's advisory and securities-issuance fees as a signal, not as a line-by-line match with PJT Partners' fees. Stronger fees point to more active transaction and financing work from companies and financial sponsors, which can create more assignments for PJT Partners to pursue. Weaker fees point to fewer or smaller opportunities. This shows the demand both firms face, not which firm wins a mandate.
Houlihan Lokey, Inc. earningsHLI
Houlihan Lokey reports Corporate Finance and Financial Restructuring separately, helping show whether deal demand or debt stress is shaping work that overlaps with PJT Partners' assignments.
Separate Houlihan Lokey's Corporate Finance results from Financial Restructuring. Stronger Corporate Finance points to more M&A and financing advice, overlapping with PJT Partners' strategic advisory work; stronger Financial Restructuring points to more clients seeking debt advice, overlapping with PJT Partners' restructuring work. If the first weakens while the second strengthens, demand may be shifting from deal advice toward debt restructuring; weakness in both suggests fewer opportunities across both areas. A peer's results signal demand, not whether PJT Partners wins the work.
Fed Interest Rate Decision
For PJT Partners, the Fed’s rate decision signals the direction of borrowing costs and interest rates, which can change interest earned on its SOFR-linked installment receivables and other interest-bearing assets.
Expected4.0%Last release4.0%
If it comes in above expectations
Higher rates can increase interest earned on PJT Partners’ SOFR-linked installment receivables and other interest-bearing assets, though they also make borrowing costlier across the economy.
If it comes in below expectations
Lower rates can reduce interest earned on PJT Partners’ SOFR-linked installment receivables and other interest-bearing assets, while making borrowing cheaper across the economy.
PJT Partners Inc. earningsThis company
PJT Partners earns fees from advisory work and placements, and this report shows whether those fees are growing faster than the costs of serving clients.
Read advisory fees and placement fees alongside total expenses. Advisory fees include strategic and restructuring work; placement fees come from fund and corporate placements. If both fee lines rise while expenses grow more slowly, more engagements are turning into recognized revenue and the firm is keeping more of it. If fees stall or expenses grow faster, transaction timing or the cost of serving clients is absorbing the gains. These fee lines do not disclose each franchise's results separately; the conclusion is whether PJT Partners is converting client work into profit.
Lincoln International, Inc. earningsLCLN
Lincoln International's Private Funds Advisory work covers fundraising and liquidity for fund stakes, showing demand in a market PJT Park Hill also serves.
Watch Lincoln International's Private Funds Advisory results and what it says about fundraising and transactions involving existing fund stakes. Stronger activity suggests fund managers and investors are moving ahead with fundraising or liquidity deals, a more supportive setting for PJT Park Hill to pursue similar work. Weaker activity suggests those assignments are harder to advance and may be less available. Lincoln reports after PJT Partners, but its business is the most direct comparison for this question.
