YSS in three months: buy, wait or sell?
Stop guessing. Get the call, a three-month target price, the best and worst cases, and a source for every claim.
- Buy / Wait / Sell rating
- 3-month target price
- Bear · Base · Bull
- vs. the market
What happened with YSS today?
No read yet
Uses news and trading volume to explain the day’s move and how it relates to the market.
Stop guessing. Get the call, a three-month target price, the best and worst cases, and a source for every claim.
York Space Systems helps customers take satellite missions from design to operation in orbit. It builds spacecraft, integrates the equipment they carry, coordinates launches, and runs the satellites and ground systems that receive their data. Its S-CLASS, LX-CLASS and M-CLASS platforms share a modular design, allowing it to reuse hardware and software across missions rather than design each spacecraft from scratch.
Most revenue comes from multi-year, fixed-price production contracts. York also earns recurring fees for keeping satellites operating, providing ground antennas and delivering data, alongside software licenses, maintenance and upgrades. It serves commercial customers, but defense work supplies almost all revenue, with the U.S. Space Development Agency (SDA) accounting for nearly all revenue and backlog. York supplies satellites for the SDA’s Proliferated Warfighter Space Architecture.
The business therefore depends heavily on SDA orders and U.S. government funding. The government can cancel contracts without cause, and York bears cost overruns under fixed-price contracts. Some work requires security-cleared facilities and a Department of Defense arrangement insulating York from foreign ownership, control or influence. U.S. export controls also restrict transfers of its technology and dealings with foreign customers and suppliers.
The risk section is the longest, dullest part of the filing. This keeps only what can really hurt you: where it hits, how hard, when it plays out.
Every company claims an edge. Each one is checked against hard numbers like margins and returns: which hold, and which line gives way first.
York’s results hinge on U.S. defense satellite procurement, especially the Space Development Agency’s PWSA program; BAE Systems and privately held K2 Space also compete in its national-security spacecraft market.
Rocket Lab competes with York to design, build and operate spacecraft for government and commercial customers. Its spacecraft and mission-services business, rather than rocket launches alone, is the part to watch for competition with York.
Northrop Grumman’s Space Systems business competes with York to build spacecraft for defense and intelligence customers. Contracts from those customers are the relevant news for York, rather than Northrop’s aircraft or other defense businesses.
Lockheed Martin’s Space business competes with York to supply spacecraft to national-security customers. Watch its spacecraft contract awards: York earns substantially all its revenue from defense markets and is sensitive to government spending.
Intuitive Machines competes with York through Lanteris, its business building satellites for national-security customers. Its work to improve the Lanteris 300 and modernize the Lanteris 1300 satellite platforms is more relevant to this rivalry than its lunar lander work.
Boeing’s Millennium Space Systems competes with York for Space Development Agency contracts to build networks of defense satellites. Watch those awards rather than Boeing’s overall results, which are dominated by much broader businesses.
Redwire competes with York to sell spacecraft to national-security and commercial space customers. Its Space business’s spacecraft sales are the relevant overlap, rather than its separate Defense Tech business.
Sidus Space, Inc. explicitly names York as a competitor: both combine satellite platforms and mission operations for government and commercial customers. Watch Sidus’s ability to integrate customers’ technology into satellites, a capability it identifies as a competitive distinction.
Satellogic Inc. overlaps with York in selling satellites and complete space programs to government customers. Its satellite sales and related services are the closer comparison with York, not its Earth-observation imagery and analytics revenue.
Northrop Grumman Corp. earningsNOC
Northrop Grumman competes with York Space Systems for defense and intelligence spacecraft contracts, so its report can show whether those customers are expanding or holding back that pool of work.
Focus on spacecraft awards and program progress in Northrop Grumman's Space Systems business, not its overall results. New or expanding defense and intelligence work would indicate those buyers are still placing orders and York's opportunity pool remains active; fewer or delayed awards would suggest a narrower pool, not prove York lost a contract.
Fed Interest Rate Decision
The Fed’s policy rate—the rate that guides borrowing costs—matters to York because higher rates can raise the interest it pays on its $150 million term debt and leave less cash for satellite production and operations.
Expected4.0%Last release4.0%
If it comes in above expectations
If the policy rate is above the estimate, higher borrowing costs may increase York’s interest expense on debt that reprices, leaving less cash for its government satellite contracts and operations.
If it comes in below expectations
If the policy rate is below the estimate, lower borrowing costs may reduce York’s interest expense on debt that reprices, leaving more cash for its government satellite contracts and operations.
York Space Systems Inc. earningsThis company
York Space Systems recognizes long-term contract revenue as costs accrue, so this report will show whether added satellite work is bringing in gross profit after cost overruns.
Read gross margin alongside unfavorable changes to estimated contract costs. A steady or higher margin with fewer unfavorable adjustments would suggest higher-margin contracts are offsetting the cost risk in fixed-price work. A falling margin or more unfavorable adjustments would show labor, materials or subcontractors are still eroding project returns. The test is whether added revenue converts into dependable gross profit, not merely whether more revenue is recognized.