PROV in three months: buy, wait or sell?
Stop guessing. Get the call, a three-month target price, the best and worst cases, and a source for every claim.
- Buy / Wait / Sell rating
- 3-month target price
- Bear · Base · Bull
- vs. the market
What happened with PROV today?
No read yet
Uses news and trading volume to explain the day’s move and how it relates to the market.
Stop guessing. Get the call, a three-month target price, the best and worst cases, and a source for every claim.
Provident Financial Holdings serves consumers and small to mid-sized businesses through Provident Savings Bank, F.S.B. The bank gathers deposits mainly in Southern California’s Inland Empire and uses those funds to make loans it keeps on its books. Single-family home mortgages make up the largest share of lending, followed by loans on apartment buildings; commercial real estate loans are a smaller part. Borrowers pay interest, while banking fees provide a smaller revenue stream.
Earnings depend mainly on the gap between interest earned on loans and investments and the cost of deposits and borrowings. FHLB–San Francisco is the bank’s main borrowing source. Almost all its property-backed loans are in California, so borrowers’ ability to repay and California property conditions matter directly to the business.
The parent company receives substantially all its own revenue as dividends from the bank. Those payments depend on the bank’s earnings and regulatory requirements, including limits that prevent distributions from reducing capital below required levels.
The risk section is the longest, dullest part of the filing. This keeps only what can really hurt you: where it hits, how hard, when it plays out.
Every company claims an edge. Each one is checked against hard numbers like margins and returns: which hold, and which line gives way first.
Sierra Bancorp and Provident Financial Hldgs share exposure to California property lending: both banks take deposits and earn income from borrowers whose loans are secured by real estate. Sierra also has substantial lending to mortgage lenders before their mortgages are sold—mortgage warehouse lending—so its results are not a pure comparison.
WaFd, Inc. competes with Provident Financial Hldgs for California depositors and property borrowers, making its deposit pricing worth watching for Provident's funding costs. Both banks also hold substantial loans on single-family homes and apartment buildings, giving their mortgage performance a common point of comparison.
Kearny Financial Corporation offers a close comparison for Provident Financial Hldgs: both use savings-bank deposits to fund large portfolios of home and apartment-building loans, earning income from borrowers while paying depositors. Watch Kearny's apartment mortgages and deposit costs as a comparison across different regions, rather than a direct read on California property conditions.
Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. provides a small-bank comparison for Provident Financial Hldgs because both put customer deposits into home and apartment-building loans and earn income from borrowers. Sound operates in Washington rather than California; watch the income from those mortgages relative to its deposit costs, not as a signal of Provident's local property market.
Finward Bancorp and Provident Financial Hldgs both rely on public deposits to fund property lending, so the income borrowers pay relative to deposit costs is a useful comparison. Finward's Peoples Bank lends mainly against single-family homes and commercial property in Northwest Indiana and Cook County, Illinois; watch those loan yields while keeping the different local markets in mind.
Sierra Bancorp earningsBSRR
Sierra Bancorp’s report will show how California property borrowers are repaying, giving Provident a read on shared market pressures facing its own real estate loans.
Read Sierra’s real estate loan performance alongside its credit-loss provision. Steady loans with no increase in provision would suggest the shared California property market is not showing greater stress; weaker performance and a higher provision would be a reason for Provident to watch repayment risk in its own California loans. Sierra also lends to mortgage lenders through warehouse financing, so its overall results are not a direct proxy for Provident’s mortgage performance.
Provident Financial Hldgs earningsThis company
Provident Financial Hldgs’ report will show whether interest from its loans and investments can keep pace with deposit and borrowing costs while covering credit losses on its property loans.
Read net interest income and net interest margin alongside deposit and borrowing costs and loan trends; net interest margin is the gap between the yield on interest-earning assets and the cost of interest-bearing funding. A wider margin with no increase in credit-loss provision would show that Provident’s funding costs are not eating into loan income. A narrower margin or a higher provision would point to more expensive funding or rising repayment risk among California property borrowers. Together, the figures show whether its main source of income is supporting steadier profits.
Fed Interest Rate Decision
Provident earns much of its income from interest on loans and investments, so Fed rate decisions can change what it earns on those assets and pays on deposits and borrowings, affecting net interest income.
Expected4.0%Last release4.0%
If it comes in above expectations
If rates rise, Provident may pay more to retain deposit funding and on borrowings; if loan and investment yields do not rise as much, its net interest income may narrow.
If it comes in below expectations
If rates fall, Provident may pay less on deposits and borrowings, but lower yields on loans and investments may offset that relief and limit any improvement in net interest income.