NAVI in three months: buy, wait or sell?
Stop guessing. Get the call, a three-month target price, the best and worst cases, and a source for every claim.
- Buy / Wait / Sell rating
- 3-month target price
- Bear · Base · Bull
- vs. the market
What happened with NAVI today?
No read yet
Uses news and trading volume to explain the day’s move and how it relates to the market.
Stop guessing. Get the call, a three-month target price, the best and worst cases, and a source for every claim.
Navient Corporation finances students’ education and refinances existing education debt through its Earnest brand. It also owns a larger portfolio of older loans from the Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP). Borrowers pay interest, and the federal government makes payments under FFELP interest-support rules. Most of Navient’s revenue comes from interest on these two portfolios; its main earnings source is what remains after paying interest on the debt that funds them.
The FFELP program no longer makes new loans, so that portfolio runs down as borrowers repay. A CFPB settlement also bars Navient from buying more FFELP loans and from servicing federal student loans except as master servicer of its own FFELP portfolio. MOHELA handles outsourced student-loan servicing, while Navient retains ownership and oversight of its portfolios.
The business depends on borrowers’ repayments, how quickly loans are paid off, and the cost of funding relative to loan interest. Navient bears the full credit risk on private loans. Federal backing covers most defaulted FFELP principal and interest, but that protection depends on compliance with servicing requirements.
The risk section is the longest, dullest part of the filing. This keeps only what can really hurt you: where it hits, how hard, when it plays out.
Every company claims an edge. Each one is checked against hard numbers like margins and returns: which hold, and which line gives way first.
Navient’s results hinge on student-loan credit losses, refinancing demand, funding costs and federal policy for its shrinking FFELP loan portfolio, while MOHELA handles outsourced loan servicing.
SLM Corporation, known as Sallie Mae, competes with Navient to lend to students and families paying for higher education; both hold private education loans and earn interest from borrowers. Watch Sallie Mae’s new private education lending and borrowers’ repayment performance for clues to demand and credit pressure facing Navient.
SLM Corporation earningsSLM
Sallie Mae’s report will show whether students and families are still borrowing for private education and repaying, offering clues to demand and credit pressure in Navient’s lending market.
Read Sallie Mae’s new private education lending alongside borrower repayment performance. Steady lending and stable repayment would point to continuing demand without a clear sign of broadening credit stress; weaker lending or repayment would suggest softer demand or rising loan-loss risk in the market Navient also serves.
Fed Interest Rate Decision
For Navient, the Fed’s decision tracks the benchmark cost of borrowing across the economy; changes can affect what it pays to fund its education-loan portfolios and the interest it earns on loans.
Expected4.0%Last release4.0%
If it comes in above expectations
If the Fed sets rates higher than expected, Navient may pay more on borrowings that reprice or on new funding, squeezing the difference between loan interest earned and funding costs; higher borrowing costs may also weigh on demand for new Earnest loans.
If it comes in below expectations
If the Fed sets rates lower than expected, Navient may pay less on repricing or new borrowings, supporting the gap between loan interest earned and funding costs; cheaper credit may also encourage refinancing, changing the pace of repayments and future interest income on its portfolios.
Navient Corporation earningsThis company
Navient’s report will show whether interest from its education-loan portfolios can cover funding costs and loan losses as balances run off and refinance lending grows.
Read the two loan segments separately: compare net interest income after loan-loss provisions with the pace of portfolio runoff and new private-loan originations. Improving income after provisions, with new lending keeping pace with paydowns, would show Navient is replacing runoff without letting credit costs overwhelm earnings. Rising provisions and a shrinking loan base would show the new lending has not replaced the income lost from older loans.